Is the Fetus a Human Entity?

"Anonymous" wrote in message
news:84YWYOSX38512.8553356482@anonymous...


Those who argue for abortion contend that the fetus is not a human
entity because it cannot live by itself. If that is the case, what is
to be said of adults whose survival depends on the use of an
artificial kidney machine or the aid of a battery-powered heart
pacemaker? Certainly those people cannot be said to be less than
human entities just because they cannot exist independently of these
aids.

Apples to oranges comparison, and one of the most prolific of the strawmen
arguments you people posit.

We know that you ****ers don't care about the woman, that is why you equate
her body with a machine: a mechanical device that is only on this planet to
serve as a baby manufacturer.

Regardless of the smarmy bull**** you morons puke out about "a life
developing inside her," the fetus is a parasite that is drawing its
existence not from a machine, but a human.

It's certainly easy to require it of others, when it doesn't have lifelong
consequences for you.

When you are required, by law, to donate a piece of your liver, a kidney, a
lung, or your entire body to keep another organism alive, then you may
actually be getting close to a decent analogy.

Until then, you are just ****ing in the wind.

You people have been told this countless times, but you choose to ignore it
and shove your heads further up your asses.

Excretia deletia

(rec.ponds removed from the spammer's initial list. Creationism left in to
**** of the ignorant mass of fundies.)

--
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
.....and ordained minister
Stork pin recipient: May 1, 2003 -Madelyn