![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mean_Chlorine wrote:
Thusly FishNoob Spake Unto All: PH is between 5.0 and 6.0 (bit closer to 6), ammonia is 0 and nitrite is 0.1. That's a low pH. Unless you are breeding sof****er fish like neons, you'd have greater margin of safety if you put a couple of limestones in the tank (which'll buffer the water and give a pH of 7.5). So it's okay to put some limestone in? I read some websites that said that rocks were okay to add as long as they *weren't* limestone Yeah, that's because most websites don't know anything at all about water chemistry, and simply quote eachother and/or books by authors who don't know anything about water chemistry either, therby perpetuating a whole range of myths. Limestone in water will neutralize acid, and raise pH. Most of our fishes come from water with a pH of about 6 - 8. This much everyone know. What the websites etc miss is that the dissolution of calcium carbonate has an endpoint at 8.3 (which, incidentally, is a 100% safe pH), and that the process speed decreases the closer you get to 8.3, so the actual pH in an aquarium filled with limestone will stabilize around 7.5. That is, you _can not_ kill your fish by raising pH with limestone. You will never reach dangerously high pH's. Ever. You've got me curious because I've not seen pH stabilize around 7.5 when I fill a tank calcium carbonate. I've always had hard, high pH tapwater, though. When I stuff a tank with carbonates, it's usually for marine fish or Tanganyikan cichlids and with hard water to start with, the pH generally ends up above 8.0. If you have time to elaborate on the equilibrium chemistry for soft water or have a link, I'd enjoy taking a look. -- Elaine T __ http://eethomp.com/fish.html '__ rec.aquaria.* FAQ http://faq.thekrib.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thusly Elaine T Spake Unto All:
You've got me curious because I've not seen pH stabilize around 7.5 when I fill a tank calcium carbonate. I've always had hard, high pH tapwater, though. When I stuff a tank with carbonates, it's usually for marine fish or Tanganyikan cichlids and with hard water to start with, the pH generally ends up above 8.0. If you have time to elaborate on the equilibrium chemistry for soft water or have a link, I'd enjoy taking a look. If you start with very hard water, it'll take very long for the acids and CO2 produced by your fish & plants to drive pH down to where the limestone will start reacting; quite possibly it'll never happen if you top up with hard water or do regular water changes - the buffering capacity of the water itself is such that the buffering capacity of the limestone never comes in to play. That is, you start with so hard water that it doesn't matter what rocks you put in. If you start with very soft water, you'll tend to end up around 7.5. Very hard natural water will at equilibrium have a pH of 8.3. This is the highest pH you can get with bicarbonate (the product of limestone dissolution and chief buffering component of natural waters). Natural waters with a pH significantly higher than that (e.g. Tanganyika, with a pH of 9 - 9.2) get that pH either because 'soda' (hydroxide) is leaching into the water from the surrounding sediments, or because there is so heavy plant growth that bicarbonate becomes depleted (the CO2 content of the water is not at equilibrium with the atmosphere). Also, and don't take this the wrong way, but unless you're using a recently calibrated electronic pH meter, ie you use drip-titration-kits or, worse, pH paper or multisticks, you don't actually know your pH with greater accuracy than +/- 0.5 to 1 unit, regardless of what it says on the box. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mean_Chlorine wrote:
Thusly Elaine T Spake Unto All: You've got me curious because I've not seen pH stabilize around 7.5 when I fill a tank calcium carbonate. I've always had hard, high pH tapwater, though. When I stuff a tank with carbonates, it's usually for marine fish or Tanganyikan cichlids and with hard water to start with, the pH generally ends up above 8.0. If you have time to elaborate on the equilibrium chemistry for soft water or have a link, I'd enjoy taking a look. If you start with very hard water, it'll take very long for the acids and CO2 produced by your fish & plants to drive pH down to where the limestone will start reacting; quite possibly it'll never happen if you top up with hard water or do regular water changes - the buffering capacity of the water itself is such that the buffering capacity of the limestone never comes in to play. That is, you start with so hard water that it doesn't matter what rocks you put in. If you start with very soft water, you'll tend to end up around 7.5. Very hard natural water will at equilibrium have a pH of 8.3. This is the highest pH you can get with bicarbonate (the product of limestone dissolution and chief buffering component of natural waters). Natural waters with a pH significantly higher than that (e.g. Tanganyika, with a pH of 9 - 9.2) get that pH either because 'soda' (hydroxide) is leaching into the water from the surrounding sediments, or because there is so heavy plant growth that bicarbonate becomes depleted (the CO2 content of the water is not at equilibrium with the atmosphere). Also, and don't take this the wrong way, but unless you're using a recently calibrated electronic pH meter, ie you use drip-titration-kits or, worse, pH paper or multisticks, you don't actually know your pH with greater accuracy than +/- 0.5 to 1 unit, regardless of what it says on the box. Thanks - that makes sense. Basically you're saying that bicarbonate from calcium carbonate only reaches its 8.3 pKa in natural waters where the amount of limestone is huge and the water has years of slow contact, right? I mostly use liquid bromthymol or bromphenol blue for measuring pH around neutral. I'm not sure what the indicator is for my liquid high range kit. However, you reminded me of the classic science lab experiment where you put a drop of BTB in distilled water. Gently blow on it for a bit and it goes yellow. Shake hard for a little while and it goes blue. Similarly, it's wickedly hard to get a reproducible pH measurement on a CO2 injected plant tank with a liquid kit. I actualy don't have too much trouble with my liqid kits getting reproducible measurements within a given day in my hardwater non-CO2 tanks (I've tried this), but you're correct that I don't know the accuracy. -- Elaine T __ http://eethomp.com/fish.html '__ rec.aquaria.* FAQ http://faq.thekrib.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On the coloration of your Zebras... the males have a silver tone to
them while females have a golden tone between the black lines. You will notice as they get larger, the females will become increasingly aggressive towards the males and they will become more gold in color and very wide. Sometimes they can be double the size of the males. A larger group will cut down on the aggression. On your leopards, there is a gold variety, a regular variety and a blue variety. There is also a long finned variety, just like in Zebras. If your fish are more gold then silver, you probably have gold leopard danios. Leopards (brachydanio frankei) and Zebras (brachydanio rerio) are two different species, so they will not breed. Although, I am sure there are hybrids; they will be more likely to breed with their own species first. Golden zebra danios, long finned golden zebras, long finned zebras, and short finned zebras, can all breed together since they are the same species... just different fancy strains created from specific breeding. Same goes for the leopard color varieties and tails listed in the second paragraph. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thusly " Spake
Unto All: Leopards (brachydanio frankei) and Zebras (brachydanio rerio) are two different species, so they will not breed. AFA is known that is not true. The leopard has never, despite considerable effort, been found in nature, and is now believed to be a captive-bred strain of zebra danio, and /Danio frankei/ is today considered a synonym of /Danio rerio/, with which it will also interbreed. However, the leopard danio has reduced fertility, which *might* indicate that it itself is a hybrid between /D. rerio/ and some other species of /Danio/. The genus /Brachydanio/ is today considered a synonym of /Danio/, comprising most of the small species of danios, whereas the genus /Devario/ comprises most of the big species (e.g. /Devario aequipinnatus/, the common giant danio). Also, FWIW, I do not recall ever having seen a silver or blue strain of leopard danio or zebra danio. I have seen albinos & partial albinos, though. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thusly Elaine T Spake Unto All:
Thanks - that makes sense. Basically you're saying that bicarbonate from calcium carbonate only reaches its 8.3 pKa in natural waters where the amount of limestone is huge and the water has years of slow contact, right? Pretty much, although in most cases you'll never actually reach 8.3. Even in areas where the bedrock is limestone, natural surface waters usually have a pH of 7.5 - 7.7-ish. I actualy don't have too much trouble with my liqid kits getting reproducible measurements within a given day in my hardwater non-CO2 tanks (I've tried this), but you're correct that I don't know the accuracy. The liquid kits usually aren't bad, and for normal aquarium use you don't need to know the pH with greater accuracy than 0.5 - 1 unit; pH is simply not that critical unless you have a specialty aquarium (e.g. high-tech plant tank or maintain a pH below 6 or above 9). The pH papers and multisticks, however, are atrocious. Maybe they're OK when they're fresh from the factory, but after a year or so on the shelf they're usually so wildly off that one IME is better off without them. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() If you start with very hard water, it'll take very long for the acids and CO2 produced by your fish & plants to drive pH down to where the limestone will start reacting; quite possibly it'll never happen if you top up with hard water or do regular water changes - the buffering capacity of the water itself is such that the buffering capacity of the limestone never comes in to play. That is, you start with so hard water that it doesn't matter what rocks you put in. If you start with very soft water, you'll tend to end up around 7.5. Very hard natural water will at equilibrium have a pH of 8.3. This is the highest pH you can get with bicarbonate (the product of limestone dissolution and chief buffering component of natural waters). Natural waters with a pH significantly higher than that (e.g. Tanganyika, with a pH of 9 - 9.2) get that pH either because 'soda' (hydroxide) is leaching into the water from the surrounding sediments, or because there is so heavy plant growth that bicarbonate becomes depleted (the CO2 content of the water is not at equilibrium with the atmosphere). This is very helpful to me as both my Juwel tanks ( 400ltr and 60ltr) ph drops all the time. Liqiud API test kit says 6.0, but I'm not so sure, as even after a 20% water change it only goes up to 6.4. So assuming I want to use crushed coral or limestone (any online UK sources ? ), how much would I need for each tank ? Also, the 400ltr has a Rena XP3 external with a bio compartment. Would I be better putting the coral inside the filter ? Thanks, Peter |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thusly "2pods" Spake Unto All:
This is very helpful to me as both my Juwel tanks ( 400ltr and 60ltr) ph drops all the time. That is possible, but unlikely. If you have, say, very large amounts of driftwood or peat, or add CO2 to the tank, or you only use RO/DI water, then you can get very low pH. Otherwise it is almost impossible to get a pH unsuitable for fish in aquaria; pH is really a non-issue in aquaria except for advanced aquarists, and then only because those screw around with water parameters a lot (and usually unnecessarily). Limestone is good because it smoothes out fluctuations and steadies the pH at a nice level, but even without you are unlikely to see dangerously low pH's unless, as I said, you're an advanced aquarist. Liqiud API test kit says 6.0, but I'm not so sure, as even after a 20% water change it only goes up to 6.4. Have you tested your tap-water? What does your waterworks say the pH of your tapwater should be? So assuming I want to use crushed coral or limestone (any online UK sources ? ), how much would I need for each tank ? It's impossible to say, but the beauty of it is that you can't hurt your fish by overdosing. Put some shells or something in, see if it helps, if not, add more. But I suspect your real problem is with your pH test kit - in most cases when people measure really low or really high pH in their tanks, it's really a case of inaccurate or aged test kits. Also, the 400ltr has a Rena XP3 external with a bio compartment. Would I be better putting the coral inside the filter ? You'll get faster/bigger effect the more finely ground the limestone is, and the more water flows past it, but the effect will never really be either fast or big. Limestone simply reacts slowly at pH's around neutral. A quicker way is to directly modify the alkalinity of the water through adding bikarbonate, but when it comes to pH quick changes are not always a good idea, and I normally suggest using limestone instead. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mean_Chlorine" wrote in message ... Thusly "2pods" Spake Unto All: This is very helpful to me as both my Juwel tanks ( 400ltr and 60ltr) ph drops all the time. That is possible, but unlikely. If you have, say, very large amounts of driftwood or peat, or add CO2 to the tank, or you only use RO/DI water, then you can get very low pH. Otherwise it is almost impossible to get a pH unsuitable for fish in aquaria; pH is really a non-issue in aquaria except for advanced aquarists, and then only because those screw around with water parameters a lot (and usually unnecessarily). Limestone is good because it smoothes out fluctuations and steadies the pH at a nice level, but even without you are unlikely to see dangerously low pH's unless, as I said, you're an advanced aquarist Liqiud API test kit says 6.0, but I'm not so sure, as even after a 20% water change it only goes up to 6.4. Have you tested your tap-water? Yes, it's dead on 7.0 What does your waterworks say the pH of your tapwater should be? 7.0 So assuming I want to use crushed coral or limestone (any online UK sources ? ), how much would I need for each tank ? It's impossible to say, but the beauty of it is that you can't hurt your fish by overdosing. Put some shells or something in, see if it helps, if not, add more. But I suspect your real problem is with your pH test kit - in most cases when people measure really low or really high pH in their tanks, it's really a case of inaccurate or aged test kits. All three test kits, of different brands ? The only difference between the affected tanks (400 and 60 ltr) and the unaffected tank (240ltr) is the fact that the plants in the low pH tanks (Cabomba, Watersprite, Hygrophillia) are growing well, while the "normal pH tank (6.8 - 7.0) has less plants and has lots of algae. All three tanks have gravel and use the same dechlor with a weekly water change. Also, the 400ltr has a Rena XP3 external with a bio compartment. Would I be better putting the coral inside the filter ? You'll get faster/bigger effect the more finely ground the limestone is, and the more water flows past it, but the effect will never really be either fast or big. Limestone simply reacts slowly at pH's around neutral. A quicker way is to directly modify the alkalinity of the water through adding bikarbonate, but when it comes to pH quick changes are not always a good idea, and I normally suggest using limestone instead. quick = bad for fish Peter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New study on UK public aquaria | Jordi Casamitjana | General | 29 | October 5th 04 10:12 AM |