![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 18:28:25 +0100, Marco Schwarz
wrote: Hi.. So I put these Clown Loaches in the tank 2 days ago, 3 of them, to eat the snails. I have a 20 gallon tank with 18 fish (8 of them are Neon Tetras), Gouramis, 3 Molly's, the Clown Loaches and others. Sorry, personally I would _never_ recommend keeping Clown Loaches in such a small tank. Do you possibly have any other (bigger) aquarium? 20g tank: Substract glas, gravel, roots, stones eventually filter volume and look what's finally netto.. Marco, I am curious about the attitude that Clowns need more space. Perhaps size is part of the reason. None of my Clowns have grown much more than 5 inches. The 2 in my 10 gallon tank seem no different than the 6 in my 75 gallon tank, similar size, color and behavior. These Clowns have been in their respective tanks about 2 1/2 years. Do you have any personal experience which causes your caution about smaller tanks? dick |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dick, I also am curiuos about this. I have three clown loaches in a 100
gallon tank, along with a few miscellanous other fish. They are only about 4 or 5 inches long also. I have had them about a year and a half and they just don't seem to grow any larger. I was told when I got them that they needed to be in a very large tank because they would get very big, but it's just not happening yet. Sarah Marco, I am curious about the attitude that Clowns need more space. Perhaps size is part of the reason. None of my Clowns have grown much more than 5 inches. The 2 in my 10 gallon tank seem no different than the 6 in my 75 gallon tank, similar size, color and behavior. These Clowns have been in their respective tanks about 2 1/2 years. Do you have any personal experience which causes your caution about smaller tanks? dick |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My Clowns are only 4" long and I've had them for 2 years in a 70g.
Either they are not eating well enough or my water is too hard, and I should look around to find someone who will take them from me. Generally they can be slow growing, especially at certain sizes, but I've found their growth rates are very much affected by water quality and diet. I think the issue with sizing the tank to the fish is two-fold. Many people only have one tank, so they need to be warned about the eventual size of the fish, to be sure they are prepared to adequately accommodate them. Others like myself & Dick have many tanks, so we can simply rotate them through increasingly larger tanks as required, or not, if not needed. The other issue is that tank size will affect their growth rate, or more particularly, water quality (which is poorer in small tanks) may stunt the fish. If moving the fish through tank upgrades, you need to be slightly ahead of their requirements to not stunt their growth (imo). A few more issues particular to botia a - they are shoaling fish, so you need many of them. - they are bottom dwellers, reducing their useable space to the square footage of the bottom. - they can be light sensitive and burrow for shelter and darkness, further reducing their usable habitat. Each of these points, should influence us to providing larger habitats. jmo -- www.NetMax.tk "Sarah Navarro" wrote in message nk.net... Dick, I also am curiuos about this. I have three clown loaches in a 100 gallon tank, along with a few miscellanous other fish. They are only about 4 or 5 inches long also. I have had them about a year and a half and they just don't seem to grow any larger. I was told when I got them that they needed to be in a very large tank because they would get very big, but it's just not happening yet. Sarah Marco, I am curious about the attitude that Clowns need more space. Perhaps size is part of the reason. None of my Clowns have grown much more than 5 inches. The 2 in my 10 gallon tank seem no different than the 6 in my 75 gallon tank, similar size, color and behavior. These Clowns have been in their respective tanks about 2 1/2 years. Do you have any personal experience which causes your caution about smaller tanks? dick |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
NetMax wrote:
My Clowns are only 4" long and I've had them for 2 years in a 70g. Either they are not eating well enough or my water is too hard, and I should look around to find someone who will take them from me. Generally they can be slow growing, especially at certain sizes, but I've found their growth rates are very much affected by water quality and diet. I think the issue with sizing the tank to the fish is two-fold. Many people only have one tank, so they need to be warned about the eventual size of the fish, to be sure they are prepared to adequately accommodate them. Others like myself & Dick have many tanks, so we can simply rotate them through increasingly larger tanks as required, or not, if not needed. The other issue is that tank size will affect their growth rate, or more particularly, water quality (which is poorer in small tanks) may stunt the fish. If moving the fish through tank upgrades, you need to be slightly ahead of their requirements to not stunt their growth (imo). A few more issues particular to botia a - they are shoaling fish, so you need many of them. - they are bottom dwellers, reducing their useable space to the square footage of the bottom. - they can be light sensitive and burrow for shelter and darkness, further reducing their usable habitat. Each of these points, should influence us to providing larger habitats. jmo At one of my LFS they have a cl loach for sail that is about 8" in size, appently the fish is about 15y old. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Netmax,
I do have several tanks, but as I gain experience I am more and more hesitant about moving my fish between tanks. I have seen "sick" fish recover in their community tanks. As to other's comment about "stunted" Clowns, this sounds negative as I associated stunted with sickness. All of my Clowns healthy and active. If they are stunted, so much the better. After I got my Clowns I read the posts warning about potential size. That was over 2 years ago. It has been over a year since I have noticed any new growth. I will be quite happy if they remain at their current sizes. dick On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:56:12 -0500, "NetMax" wrote: My Clowns are only 4" long and I've had them for 2 years in a 70g. Either they are not eating well enough or my water is too hard, and I should look around to find someone who will take them from me. Generally they can be slow growing, especially at certain sizes, but I've found their growth rates are very much affected by water quality and diet. I think the issue with sizing the tank to the fish is two-fold. Many people only have one tank, so they need to be warned about the eventual size of the fish, to be sure they are prepared to adequately accommodate them. Others like myself & Dick have many tanks, so we can simply rotate them through increasingly larger tanks as required, or not, if not needed. The other issue is that tank size will affect their growth rate, or more particularly, water quality (which is poorer in small tanks) may stunt the fish. If moving the fish through tank upgrades, you need to be slightly ahead of their requirements to not stunt their growth (imo). A few more issues particular to botia a - they are shoaling fish, so you need many of them. - they are bottom dwellers, reducing their useable space to the square footage of the bottom. - they can be light sensitive and burrow for shelter and darkness, further reducing their usable habitat. Each of these points, should influence us to providing larger habitats. jmo |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
'Stunted' tends to have a negative connotation, and if it's due to bad
conditions, then it's deserved. It's interesting to note that stunted fish (I call them runts) are also naturally occurring. I think this is part of their evolutionary strategy of constant diversification through mutation. Non-natural runts (stunted by environment rather than genetics) can occur from a variety of reasons. The most predominant would appear to be diet (ie: feeding only a flake food), but it was explained to me that water parameter dilution also plays a major part, especially with certain species. The explanation was as follows: A growing fish will release hormones which it can then detect back from the water. If the hormones are not detectable or very low, then the body of water is large and/or there is no or little competition from similar species, so the proper action would be to expend more energy on growth (until some other constraint develops, such as genetics, food supply etc). If the hormones detected back are high, then the body of water is small (or shrinking), or there is significant competition from similar species (both indicating a reduced food supply), so a proper action might be to not expand energy on growth, and stay small (surviving on less food). If this analysis is correct (and I suspect that there is significant truth behind it), then it would go a long way to explaining why total sizes for fish are so different from an aquarium (where these hormones are in high concentration) and from nature. Loaches in particular are mostly from the Mekong river system fed from mountain ranges (refreshed from heavy rainfall and snowmelt), so their reaction (stunting) to accumulated elements in an aquarium (nitrates, hormones etc) might be much more acute than lake fish, such as African mbuna, which do approach and even exceed their natural size in nature. -- www.NetMax.tk "Dick" wrote in message ... Hi Netmax, I do have several tanks, but as I gain experience I am more and more hesitant about moving my fish between tanks. I have seen "sick" fish recover in their community tanks. As to other's comment about "stunted" Clowns, this sounds negative as I associated stunted with sickness. All of my Clowns healthy and active. If they are stunted, so much the better. After I got my Clowns I read the posts warning about potential size. That was over 2 years ago. It has been over a year since I have noticed any new growth. I will be quite happy if they remain at their current sizes. dick On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:56:12 -0500, "NetMax" wrote: My Clowns are only 4" long and I've had them for 2 years in a 70g. Either they are not eating well enough or my water is too hard, and I should look around to find someone who will take them from me. Generally they can be slow growing, especially at certain sizes, but I've found their growth rates are very much affected by water quality and diet. I think the issue with sizing the tank to the fish is two-fold. Many people only have one tank, so they need to be warned about the eventual size of the fish, to be sure they are prepared to adequately accommodate them. Others like myself & Dick have many tanks, so we can simply rotate them through increasingly larger tanks as required, or not, if not needed. The other issue is that tank size will affect their growth rate, or more particularly, water quality (which is poorer in small tanks) may stunt the fish. If moving the fish through tank upgrades, you need to be slightly ahead of their requirements to not stunt their growth (imo). A few more issues particular to botia a - they are shoaling fish, so you need many of them. - they are bottom dwellers, reducing their useable space to the square footage of the bottom. - they can be light sensitive and burrow for shelter and darkness, further reducing their usable habitat. Each of these points, should influence us to providing larger habitats. jmo |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
NetMax wrote:
'Stunted' tends to have a negative connotation, and if it's due to bad conditions, then it's deserved. It's interesting to note that stunted fish (I call them runts) are also naturally occurring. I think this is part of their evolutionary strategy of constant diversification through mutation. Non-natural runts (stunted by environment rather than genetics) can occur from a variety of reasons. The most predominant would appear to be diet (ie: feeding only a flake food), but it was explained to me that water parameter dilution also plays a major part, especially with certain species. The explanation was as follows: A growing fish will release hormones which it can then detect back from the water. If the hormones are not detectable or very low, then the body of water is large and/or there is no or little competition from similar species, so the proper action would be to expend more energy on growth (until some other constraint develops, such as genetics, food supply etc). If the hormones detected back are high, then the body of water is small (or shrinking), or there is significant competition from similar species (both indicating a reduced food supply), so a proper action might be to not expand energy on growth, and stay small (surviving on less food). If this analysis is correct (and I suspect that there is significant truth behind it), then it would go a long way to explaining why total sizes for fish are so different from an aquarium (where these hormones are in high concentration) and from nature. Loaches in particular are mostly from the Mekong river system fed from mountain ranges (refreshed from heavy rainfall and snowmelt), so their reaction (stunting) to accumulated elements in an aquarium (nitrates, hormones etc) might be much more acute than lake fish, such as African mbuna, which do approach and even exceed their natural size in nature. Hmmm....interesting I have a "stunted" Platy. He's around 1 year old and has never grown above 1cm. Platy fry from the same parents but in the "parent" tank grow rapidly to "adult" size. The "stunted" Platy has always lived in a 5gall tank (was born in it). His last contact with Platys was at around 2 months old when I netted out the fry and took them to the LFS - he remained only because he jumped out of the bag and so I decided that he may as well stay. His only fishy companions have been single bettas. Diet has always been varied - flake and frozen and the odd bits of pea that have been fed to the betta yet he has always remained small. My guess is that he is a "natural runt" but as he had never had any competition from other platys I've also wondered if this has been another reason for the lack of growth. Maybe sharing the tank with a betta might also have meant that staying small has been to his advantage in keeping out of trouble. I actually spotted some dinky platys (I'm guessing very young) at the LFS and bought him 3 small companions today - his days as a betta companion are over. If they get too big they will move on to a larger tank. It will be interesting to see if he grows at all now he is mixing with his "own kind" Gill |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Gill Passman" wrote in message
.. . NetMax wrote: 'Stunted' tends to have a negative connotation, and if it's due to bad conditions, then it's deserved. It's interesting to note that stunted fish (I call them runts) are also naturally occurring. I think this is part of their evolutionary strategy of constant diversification through mutation. Non-natural runts (stunted by environment rather than genetics) can occur from a variety of reasons. The most predominant would appear to be diet (ie: feeding only a flake food), but it was explained to me that water parameter dilution also plays a major part, especially with certain species. The explanation was as follows: A growing fish will release hormones which it can then detect back from the water. If the hormones are not detectable or very low, then the body of water is large and/or there is no or little competition from similar species, so the proper action would be to expend more energy on growth (until some other constraint develops, such as genetics, food supply etc). If the hormones detected back are high, then the body of water is small (or shrinking), or there is significant competition from similar species (both indicating a reduced food supply), so a proper action might be to not expand energy on growth, and stay small (surviving on less food). If this analysis is correct (and I suspect that there is significant truth behind it), then it would go a long way to explaining why total sizes for fish are so different from an aquarium (where these hormones are in high concentration) and from nature. Loaches in particular are mostly from the Mekong river system fed from mountain ranges (refreshed from heavy rainfall and snowmelt), so their reaction (stunting) to accumulated elements in an aquarium (nitrates, hormones etc) might be much more acute than lake fish, such as African mbuna, which do approach and even exceed their natural size in nature. Hmmm....interesting I have a "stunted" Platy. He's around 1 year old and has never grown above 1cm. Platy fry from the same parents but in the "parent" tank grow rapidly to "adult" size. The "stunted" Platy has always lived in a 5gall tank (was born in it). His last contact with Platys was at around 2 months old when I netted out the fry and took them to the LFS - he remained only because he jumped out of the bag and so I decided that he may as well stay. His only fishy companions have been single bettas. Diet has always been varied - flake and frozen and the odd bits of pea that have been fed to the betta yet he has always remained small. My guess is that he is a "natural runt" but as he had never had any competition from other platys I've also wondered if this has been another reason for the lack of growth. Maybe sharing the tank with a betta might also have meant that staying small has been to his advantage in keeping out of trouble. I actually spotted some dinky platys (I'm guessing very young) at the LFS and bought him 3 small companions today - his days as a betta companion are over. If they get too big they will move on to a larger tank. It will be interesting to see if he grows at all now he is mixing with his "own kind" Gill Two things came to mind reading your post. The first was a vague recollection of a correlation between growth and competition, such that a competitive environment causes them to grow faster. The 2nd was that the longer a fish is exposed to the environmental conditions which cause them to stop or reduce their growth, the less likely it becomes that they will resume their normal growth rate or reach their normal size after the conditions have been corrected. This is only from personal observation. -- www.NetMax.tk |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sarah Navarro wrote:
Dick, I also am curiuos about this. I have three clown loaches in a 100 gallon tank, along with a few miscellanous other fish. They are only about 4 or 5 inches long also. I have had them about a year and a half and they just don't seem to grow any larger. I was told when I got them that they needed to be in a very large tank because they would get very big, but it's just not happening yet. Patience. A clown has a life expectancy of about 30 years, and they grow all the time, although growth slows down as they become older. What you buy in a LFS is a toddler. To OP: clowns tend to be quite shy and nocturnal at first, once they have adapted to their new home they become bolder, especially if kept in groups (5 to 6 is the minimum recommended). Clowns should always be supplied with hide-outs like PVC pipes, coconut shells, peat wood and the like. Note that clowns can recognise their keeper, when I had some they would not mind my presence but vanish if a stranger entered the room. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dr Engelbert Buxbaum" wrote in message ... Note that clowns can recognise their keeper, when I had some they would not mind my presence but vanish if a stranger entered the room. ============================ My Malawi cichlids were the same way. Whenever a stranger came into the house they'd vanish into the rockpile leaving what appeared to be an empty tank. But if you looked close you could see their beady little eyes in the darkness of the caves and crevices. They'd all be watching what was going on from their hidey-holes. -- Koi-Lo.... frugal ponding since 1995... Aquariums since 1952 My Pond & Aquarium Pages: NEW PAGE: Aquariums: http://bellsouthpwp.net/s/h/shastada...ium-Page4.html http://bellsouthpwp.net/s/h/shastadaisy ~~~ }((((o ~~~ }{{{{o ~~~ }(((((o |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Quarantining Clown Loaches | Gill Passman | General | 12 | November 30th 05 02:51 AM |
I lost 2 clown loaches | nmbr1ddy | General | 9 | August 28th 05 09:18 PM |
Our Clown Loaches might have Ich | Glengoyne | General | 18 | August 13th 05 05:22 AM |
Questions on Ich medication, clown loaches | Ross Vandegrift | General | 4 | February 24th 05 09:30 AM |
Clown Loaches flashing | BigBadGourami | General | 45 | January 14th 05 04:00 PM |