![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I may not use the proper terminology, but if anyone can make heads or tails
out of this and responds or tells me where I can find more information I sure would appreciate it. There seems to be a sort of local water table with respect to ponds. To put it one way, if you dig a hole in the ground and fill it with water will the water drain out? If it does, the hole must be above the local water table. If it fills up with water by itself while you are fussing with the hose to try to fill it up, I'd say the hole is well below the local water table. I'd guess unlined ponds behave much the same way. Some are above the local water table and others are below it or intersect it. If a pond is normally above the local water table it always must drain into it, even if only a little. The water flow (granted it may not be very much at all) will constantly go from the pond into the ground. There are times, however, (like after a heavy rain) when a saturated ground will actually result in the local water table being above the pond, and the water flow will be from the ground into the pond. Depending on the porosity of the ground and how much rain there was and things like that I could see this kind of reversal happening several times a month. I realize that this kind of movement is very slow, is it so minimal in most cases as to not be worth considering? I can't find anything on it, so maybe it is insignificant. The other case would be a pond that didn't "breathe," such as one that intersects the water table. A hard rain might dump 6 inches of water in the pond, but it would also dump it on the surrounding land, so while the water in the pond might rise, the surrounding local water table would also rise by about the same amount, resulting in virtually no flow between the ground and the pond. Like I say, though, this difference may be insignificant enough to be safely ignored, but I can find nothing that addresses it. The above assumes, of course, that there is absolutely no surface run-off or anything else involved, something that would horribly complicate this rather simplistic (and perhaps stupid) question. Galen Hekhuis NpD, JFR, GWA We are the CroMagnon of the future |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Galen Hekhuis" wrote in message ... I may not use the proper terminology, but if anyone can make heads or tails out of this and responds or tells me where I can find more information I sure would appreciate it. There seems to be a sort of local water table with respect to ponds. To put it one way, if you dig a hole in the ground and fill it with water will the water drain out? If it does, the hole must be above the local water table. If it fills up with water by itself while you are fussing with the hose to try to fill it up, I'd say the hole is well below the local water table. I'd guess unlined ponds behave much the same way. Some are above the local water table and others are below it or intersect it. From what I know if the bottom of a soil pond is above the water table the water will drain away. If a hole fills in it's below the water table. Some ponds with certain clay soils will not empty but retain water. If a pond is normally above the local water table it always must drain into it, even if only a little. The water flow (granted it may not be very much at all) will constantly go from the pond into the ground. There are times, however, (like after a heavy rain) when a saturated ground will actually result in the local water table being above the pond, and the water flow will be from the ground into the pond. Depending on the porosity of the ground and how much rain there was and things like that I could see this kind of reversal happening several times a month. I realize that this kind of movement is very slow, is it so minimal in most cases as to not be worth considering? I can't find anything on it, so maybe it is insignificant. No one can say. It depends on how much rain you get where YOU live and YOUR soil conditions. You can have a friend call your county (Agricultural) extension agent for information on your area - and who you can contact for the information you seek . Galen Hekhuis NpD, JFR, GWA We are the CroMagnon of the future -- Koi-Lo.... frugal ponding since 1995... Aquariums since 1952 My Pond & Aquarium Pages: Aquariums: http://bellsouthpwp.net/s/h/shastada...ium-Page4.html http://bellsouthpwp.net/s/h/shastadaisy ~~~ }((((o ~~~ }{{{{o ~~~ }(((((o |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not sure what you're trying to ask. I think you're asking if an unlined
pond will eventually drain out. The answer is it depends on so many things as you pointed out. Depth of water table, soil type, porosity of soil, Obviously natural ponds and lakes are proof, that some can exist perpetually, though they are often fed by rain run off, rivers or just an incredibly shallow watertable. Water table depth , porousness of the soil, evaporation rate, and rainfall all impact the water level of an unlined pond. Contrary to your assessment, these factors all play heavily into the viability of an unlined pond. Consider that some ponders in new mexico and arizona have reported a water loss of 1-2 inches per day from evaporation in the summer. Natural ponds also experience similar cycles, some years they dry out completely, other years the water level recedes drastically, other years they flood over their banks. Call your local water district, they'll be able to answer these questions as they relate specifically to your area. In my area, the water district/municipality maintains an artificial pond near my house that are designed to help refill the ground water supply. I bet they know exactly the rate at which the water level fluctuates, and even exactly where the water goes, evaporation or absorption into the soil. Good luck. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Koi-lo" wrote in message ... If it's from PRODIGY NET it's the imposter. ;-) Another "imposter" troll post. What was trolling about that post? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:00:14 GMT, "Koi-lo" wrote:
I'm not sure what you're trying to ask. Let me try another way then. In caving, we generally speak of two zones, the vadose, or what I describe as being above the water table, and phreatic, or below the water table. As far as caves go, the vadose zone is where erosion takes place to form passages, in the phreatic zone, solution is the primary factor. Much cave passage is formed by solution (generally a weak acid solution which dissolves the limestone) and then when the water table falls, passages are enlarged (or filled) by erosion in the vadose zone, as water makes it down to the phreatic zone. The two are not completely distinct, but that is a general picture. Frequently we find examples of stream erosion in the vadose zone (air filled passages) in a section formed entirely by solution when it was in the phreatic zone. As far as ponds go, some must be in the vadose zone (frequently requiring some sort of physical barrier to retain the water, often a liner) and some are "windows" in the phreatic zone, and depend entirely upon the level of the water table for their ability to retain water. When the water table goes down, likewise so does the level of water in the phreatic pond. The reverse is true when the water table rises. A pond in the vadose zone, however, will be virtually independent of what the water table does, and the water level will be entirely dependent on how impermeable the barrier is. (Assuming, of course, things like evaporation are ignored.) Now I can see a whole lot of complications, such as a phreatic pond being filled by the run off from land that is above the water table, resulting in a phreatic pond with vadose conditions near the surface, but in the case of an "ideal" pond, is it proper to divide them into two kinds, or is it largely a case of a distinction without much of a difference? It makes a fair amount of difference in speleogenesis, does it matter in regards to ponds? I think you're asking if an unlined pond will eventually drain out. The answer is it depends on so many things as you pointed out. Depth of water table, soil type, porosity of soil, Obviously natural ponds and lakes are proof, that some can exist perpetually, though they are often fed by rain run off, rivers or just an incredibly shallow watertable. Water table depth , porousness of the soil, evaporation rate, and rainfall all impact the water level of an unlined pond. Contrary to your assessment, these factors all play heavily into the viability of an unlined pond. Consider that some ponders in new mexico and arizona have reported a water loss of 1-2 inches per day from evaporation in the summer. Natural ponds also experience similar cycles, some years they dry out completely, other years the water level recedes drastically, other years they flood over their banks. Call your local water district, they'll be able to answer these questions as they relate specifically to your area. In my area, the water district/municipality maintains an artificial pond near my house that are designed to help refill the ground water supply. I bet they know exactly the rate at which the water level fluctuates, and even exactly where the water goes, evaporation or absorption into the soil. The pond I'm fussing with seems to be entirely phreatic. Before the bulldozer and stuff came, I pumped out the water in the pond. If, however, I just left things alone, water would again re-enter the pond. After the bulldozer came, I quit pumping, and now, about a week later, the pond probably has a good four feet of water near the center. The water level rises not as fast now, but I'd guess it is about 1/2 inch a day. I'm guessing it has about another foot to go before it quits. Sure, we've had a little rain here, but hardly enough to dramatically change the water level in the pond. There is absolutely no run off into the pond, the land surrounding the pond is a higher than the land that might possibly drain into it. Granted, it is only a few inches higher, but that is enough. (The land right here is like that. I noticed when I was digging post holes for railing uprights that if I went down about a foot it got *real* damp, and if I went much more I'd strike wet mud.) Galen Hekhuis NpD, JFR, GWA We are the CroMagnon of the future |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:34:59 -0500, Hal wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:19:11 -0500, Galen Hekhuis wrote: I may not use the proper terminology, but if anyone can make heads or tails out of this and responds or tells me where I can find more information I sure would appreciate it. I don't know of a source of information on breathing ponds. I could be quite happy with what you have, but it would not be what I have now. I have a lined koi pond that only gets new water when I add it, not a continual addition of water daily from ground water. I would expect that your pond may not remain clear all the time because of the continual replacement of water, I don't think the water is replaced continuously at all. In fact, now that you bring it up, I think there is very little water exchange in a phreatic type pond. Evaporation might be a factor, but the humidity is quite high here in Florida, and I doubt evaporation is quite the factor it might be in the Southwest. but I wouldn't filter it, (Just as futile as filtering an above ground stream.) and I think I might wait a year before I even attempted to aerate. I believe I would consider the water temperature and life in the water before aerating. I've seen holes in the ground in Florida that filled with clear ground water and soon had a few blue gills. You might be that lucky, if not you may have to learn to live with what you have, or cover it up if you don't like it, because IMHO, your control of flowing water is limited. Regards, Hal Galen Hekhuis NpD, JFR, GWA We are the CroMagnon of the future |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Koi-lo" wrote in message et... "Koi-lo" wrote in message ... If it's from PRODIGY NET it's the imposter. ;-) Another "imposter" troll post. What was trolling about that post? ============================== Trolls use other people's NYMs as you should know by now. You must really admire a person to want to impersonate them so much. :-) Thanks for the complement. -- Koi-Lo.... frugal ponding since 1995... Aquariums since 1952 My Pond & Aquarium Pages: Aquariums: http://bellsouthpwp.net/s/h/shastada...ium-Page4.html http://bellsouthpwp.net/s/h/shastadaisy ~~~ }((((o ~~~ }{{{{o ~~~ }(((((o |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Galen Hekhuis" wrote in message ... After the bulldozer came, I quit pumping, and now, about a week later, the pond probably has a good four feet of water near the center. The water level rises not as fast now, but I'd guess it is about 1/2 inch a day. I'm guessing it has about another foot to go before it quits. Sure, we've had a little rain here, but hardly enough to dramatically change the water level in the pond. Then it's probably being fed by and underground spring or the water table is causing it to fill. There is absolutely no run off into the pond, the land surrounding the pond is a higher than the land that might possibly drain into it. Granted, it is only a few inches higher, but that is enough. (The land right here is like that. I noticed when I was digging post holes for railing uprights that if I went down about a foot it got *real* damp, and if I went much more I'd strike wet mud.) Galen Hekhuis NpD, JFR, GWA We are the CroMagnon of the future -- Koi-Lo.... frugal ponding since 1995... Aquariums since 1952 My Pond & Aquarium Pages: Aquariums: http://bellsouthpwp.net/s/h/shastada...ium-Page4.html http://bellsouthpwp.net/s/h/shastadaisy ~~~ }((((o ~~~ }{{{{o ~~~ }(((((o |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Galen Hekhuis wrote:
I may not use the proper terminology, but can anyone make heads or tails out of this and responds or tells me where I can find more information I sure would appreciate it. Ponds need to be aerated especially if they have fish, but also to prevent anaerobic bacteria from getting started and creating the stinky stagnant smell. Ponds need to expel bad gasses. That would be excess CO2, and other waste gasses and especially sulfur and nitrogen compounds. See: http://www.malibuwater.com/h2s.htm -- Pardon my spam deterrent; send email to 18,000 gallon (17'x 47'x 2-4') lily pond garden in Zone 6 Cheers, Steve Henning in Reading, PA USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pond pictures and update | Chrissy | General (alternative) | 13 | February 2nd 11 06:50 PM |
Filtering a big pond | Galen Hekhuis | General | 25 | January 15th 06 11:23 PM |
Rec.ponds FAQ | Snooze | General | 7 | April 11th 05 07:04 AM |
pond opinions? | Thenewguy | General | 10 | September 14th 03 11:20 PM |
WHAT... My pond a sandpit | Mistatee | General | 15 | August 28th 03 08:47 PM |