![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've just purchased a 6 stage 100 GPD (nowhere near that) RO unit and have
ran it for a full day now most of that time was flushing the membranes and the TDS readings were thus. tap water = 210ppm during flush = 10ppm. after flush and tap switched to produce RO water = 11ppm. now I have disguarded the first 40 litres of water and am now collecting the RO in a water butt. the reading is still 11ppm but now I keep getting static shocks when I get near the water. anyone with similar experiences and what readings should I be getting before I start using this water for water-changes. Robin |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "robin.gordon1" wrote in message ... I've just purchased a 6 stage 100 GPD (nowhere near that) RO unit and have ran it for a full day now most of that time was flushing the membranes and the TDS readings were thus. tap water = 210ppm during flush = 10ppm. after flush and tap switched to produce RO water = 11ppm. now I have disguarded the first 40 litres of water and am now collecting the RO in a water butt. the reading is still 11ppm but now I keep getting static shocks when I get near the water. anyone with similar experiences and what readings should I be getting before I start using this water for water-changes. Humm.... getting 10-11ppm product water on RO.... depend on the carbon / sediment / PSI. What are those size of those? Water pressure have major affect of the product water. With 100GPD, higher pressure about 80PSI range. Low pressure will have lesser effecient which will pass more nutrient [higher ppm]. I have 5 stage RO with the following - 1 sediemnt = 1 micron 2 carbon = 1 micron 1 membrane = 75GPD 1 post carbon = ?? do not remember at ths time. 45 PSI Getting 4ppm product water. From tap = 245ppm CapFusion,... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
the stages are thus;
100 gallon per day membrane 5 micron sediment pre-filter 1 solid carbon block filter 1 GAC coconut carbon filter 1 inline carbon filter 1 inline DI filter pressure= ? tap = 211ppm RO = 011ppm i thought that i could put up with a slow production but not poor water quality, especially with the money spent. surely 11ppm is a lot better for my reef than 210ppm. i did have a tapwater purifier but i'm not sure of it's quality. i'd be a bit peeved if it's better. Robin |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"robin.gordon1" wrote in message ...
the stages are thus; 100 gallon per day membrane 5 micron sediment pre-filter 1 solid carbon block filter 1 GAC coconut carbon filter 1 inline carbon filter 1 inline DI filter pressure= ? tap = 211ppm RO = 011ppm I have KENT 10gpd barebone system: prefilter with carbon and sediment filter, after TFC membrane I have KENT DI stage with mixed bed resin. After membrane I read 5-6ppm, after DI stage, when water is dripping from the pipe it is 0-1ppm. When the water collects in the bucket and equilibrate with the air (mostly CO2) it could have high tds readings. CO2 dissolved in water could decrease water resistance measured with TDS meter increasing readings. i thought that i could put up with a slow production but not poor water quality, especially with the money spent. surely 11ppm is a lot better for my reef than 210ppm. i did have a tapwater purifier but i'm not sure of it's quality. i'd be a bit peeved if it's better. Check directly water dripping from the product line. In your case, it will not drip but flow rapidly, I guess ;-) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
3 stages of carbon filtration sounds funny to me.
My Culligan RO unit has a 5 micron sediment/carbon stage followed by an RO membrane. Since it's a CTA membrane I'm only getting about a 95% rejection of "bad stuff" 11 ppm / 210 ppm = 95% rejection Sounds ok for RO to me but with the DI stage you should be doing better. I'd take a look at the output of the various stages to see what each is doing. DI alone should get that water very, very clean if it's new. Erik On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 18:09:06 GMT, "robin.gordon1" wrote: the stages are thus; 100 gallon per day membrane 5 micron sediment pre-filter 1 solid carbon block filter 1 GAC coconut carbon filter 1 inline carbon filter 1 inline DI filter pressure= ? tap = 211ppm RO = 011ppm i thought that i could put up with a slow production but not poor water quality, especially with the money spent. surely 11ppm is a lot better for my reef than 210ppm. i did have a tapwater purifier but i'm not sure of it's quality. i'd be a bit peeved if it's better. Robin |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"erik" wrote in message ...
3 stages of carbon filtration sounds funny to me. My Culligan RO unit has a 5 micron sediment/carbon stage followed by an RO membrane. Since it's a CTA membrane I'm only getting about a 95% rejection of "bad stuff" Hm... you have carbon filter in front of your CTA membrane... strange. I understand CTA membrane is made from organics (cellulose) and needs chlorine in the water to kill bacteria chewing on cellulose... Your carbon filter is removing chlorine from the incoming water... How long do you use your setup? Is it DIY or purchased complete? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's semi-DIY.
My father owns a Culligan dealership ( Culligan is a national residential and commercial water treatment company in the US ) and put it together from parts he had laying around. It was a TFC membrane for several years. Then when I asked him for a replacement he grabbed me a CTA. A few months after I got it I came across an article stating that there were potential problems with non chlorinated water and CTA membranes. I asked my father about it ('cause he's supposed to know these things) and he said that there should be nothing to worry about. Well water is full of bacteria and therefore would destroy the CTA membrane. But city water is chlorinated and should be bacteria free. The carbon prefilter removes the chlorine so the water reaching the CTA membrane should be chlorine and bacteria free. Any thoughts? Is my logic incorrect? Erik On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 08:38:17 -0500, "Pszemol" wrote: "erik" wrote in message ... 3 stages of carbon filtration sounds funny to me. My Culligan RO unit has a 5 micron sediment/carbon stage followed by an RO membrane. Since it's a CTA membrane I'm only getting about a 95% rejection of "bad stuff" Hm... you have carbon filter in front of your CTA membrane... strange. I understand CTA membrane is made from organics (cellulose) and needs chlorine in the water to kill bacteria chewing on cellulose... Your carbon filter is removing chlorine from the incoming water... How long do you use your setup? Is it DIY or purchased complete? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "robin.gordon1" wrote in message ... the stages are thus; 100 gallon per day membrane 5 micron sediment pre-filter 1 solid carbon block filter 1 GAC coconut carbon filter 1 inline carbon filter 1 inline DI filter pressure= ? tap = 211ppm RO = 011ppm i thought that i could put up with a slow production but not poor water quality, especially with the money spent. surely 11ppm is a lot better for my reef than 210ppm. i did have a tapwater purifier but i'm not sure of it's quality. i'd be a bit peeved if it's better. Robin I did not notice you have a DI stage from your previous message. You should be getting close to non-detetable or close to zero from DI output. What micron size on your 2 carbon block? CapFusion,... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stange Readings? | Mort | Reefs | 8 | February 2nd 04 05:11 AM |
Calcium Test Kit Readings | Mort | Reefs | 16 | November 8th 03 04:40 AM |
do these readings look normal | BigHaig | Reefs | 6 | November 7th 03 01:40 AM |
do these readings look normal | BigHaig | General | 1 | November 6th 03 03:08 PM |