![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, Once your tank has cycled after starting the FOWLR, from there you can
pretty much do anything you want. After the tank cycles, add a few fish to see how they adapt, then if you like, more fish or corals and anemones. The foundation for a reef tank is LR, Get that started first. I would suggest that you keep a log of everything you do to the tank for at least 1 year. The log should state when you test the waters (date and time) what the results were and also when you added what live stock to your tank. The log is a good reference point should you have a problem down the line, you can learn from any mistakes you may have made. Good luck wrote in message ... On 11-Sep-2006, George Patterson wrote: To a certain extent, larger tanks require less work and are more successful than smaller ones. Your filtration will be woefully inadequate, IMO. From experience I can agree with the larger tank concept. My 120 freshwater never had water quality issues....ever. Could you make a suggestion to a more appropriate Filtration System? You also should decide which way you want to take this. There are three basic marine setups; fish-only, fish-only with live rock, and reef. Would it be realistic to go FOWLR with the option to upgrade to a reef? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rec.ponds FAQ | Snooze | General | 0 | May 17th 05 03:05 AM |
Rec.ponds FAQ | Snooze | General | 7 | April 11th 05 07:04 AM |
Salt in a Nutshell | Lee B. | General | 24 | February 13th 04 02:05 PM |
No Better RO/DI Anywhere!!! | Pat Hogan | General | 0 | November 14th 03 05:57 PM |
Alkalinity problems? | D&M | General | 5 | July 15th 03 12:48 AM |