![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
NO3 is not split into N2 and O2 it is broken down enzymatically into N2
and H2O. No, it's not. The oxygen is removed by bacteria, releasing the nitrogen. The oxygens are removed from NO3- and released to the 'system' in the form of H2O not O2 as you stated earlier. This should give you a clue: Why would anaerobic bacteria that thrive in low O2 environments produce O2? Don't you think this would be counter productive to there survival? I will write this again for the umpteen time. This process is called DENITRIFICATION. It is an enzymatic process that converts NO3- into H2O and N2 (O2 is NOT produced). The process involves anaerobic bacteria that contain the enzyme nitrate reductase (among others involved in denitrification). O2 is NOT produced. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne. Follow closely. I will type slowly for you.
I (STOUTMAN) WROTE: NO3 is not split into N2 and O2 it is broken down enzymatically into N2 and H2O. PATTERSON WROTE THIS IN RESPONSE TO MY MESSAGE: "No, it's not. The oxygen is removed by bacteria, releasing the nitrogen." He is stating that my above statement is wrong by saying "NO, it's not", therefore this means he does not agree with me that NO3- goes to N2 and H2O. If Patterson believes that oxygen is removed by the enzyme and only N2 is produced. What happens to the oxygen? Where do you/he think it goes? Do you think it stays in the enzyme? It is my contention that Patterson STILL thinks O2 is produced. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok, so your point is that he is saying no to your no :-)
And you are saying no to his no :-) Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Stoutman wrote on 9/16/2006 5:28 PM: Wayne. Follow closely. I will type slowly for you. I (STOUTMAN) WROTE: NO3 is not split into N2 and O2 it is broken down enzymatically into N2 and H2O. PATTERSON WROTE THIS IN RESPONSE TO MY MESSAGE: "No, it's not. The oxygen is removed by bacteria, releasing the nitrogen." He is stating that my above statement is wrong by saying "NO, it's not", therefore this means he does not agree with me that NO3- goes to N2 and H2O. If Patterson believes that oxygen is removed by the enzyme and only N2 is produced. What happens to the oxygen? Where do you/he think it goes? Do you think it stays in the enzyme? It is my contention that Patterson STILL thinks O2 is produced. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok, so your point is that he is saying no to your no :-)
And you are saying no to his no :-) No ![]() Not exactly. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stoutman wrote:
If Patterson believes that oxygen is removed by the enzyme and only N2 is produced. What happens to the oxygen? Where do you/he think it goes? Do you think it stays in the enzyme? Not enzyme. Bacteria. Yes, that's exactly what happens. The oxygen is consumed by the bacteria. George Patterson Coffee is only a way of stealing time that should by rights belong to your slightly older self. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If Patterson believes that oxygen is removed by the enzyme and only N2 is
produced. What happens to the oxygen? Where do you/he think it goes? Do you think it stays in the enzyme? Not enzyme. Bacteria. Yes, that's exactly what happens. The oxygen is consumed by the bacteria. First: These denitrifying bacteria are anaerobic. They thrive in LOW oxygen conditions. Anoxic conditions are required for their survival. This means they do not need nor do they consume oxygen to survive. Why do you insist that anaerobic bacteria involved in denitrification consume oxygen? Oxygen is a TOXIN for most anaerobic bacteria. They do not produce nor consume oxygen. Anaerobic bacteria can not even grow in the presence of oxygen. Second: Oxygen is NOT produced. The end result biproducts of nitrate metabolism by denitrifying bacteria are N2 and H2O. I am not guessing here. nitrogen cycle: http://www.reefscapes.net/articles/a...ogencycle.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denitrification |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you had a system with aerobic bacteria in a filter
medium, with good water movement growing well with lot's of oxygen, and lot's of nitrates, and then you were to seal it off from fresh oxygen and there was plenty of food there for the bacteria to continue growing, how long do you think it would take for the nitrates to reach 0 nitrates? Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Stoutman wrote on 9/16/2006 8:19 PM: If Patterson believes that oxygen is removed by the enzyme and only N2 is produced. What happens to the oxygen? Where do you/he think it goes? Do you think it stays in the enzyme? Not enzyme. Bacteria. Yes, that's exactly what happens. The oxygen is consumed by the bacteria. First: These denitrifying bacteria are anaerobic. They thrive in LOW oxygen conditions. Anoxic conditions are required for their survival. This means they do not need nor do they consume oxygen to survive. Why do you insist that anaerobic bacteria involved in denitrification consume oxygen? Oxygen is a TOXIN for most anaerobic bacteria. They do not produce nor consume oxygen. Anaerobic bacteria can not even grow in the presence of oxygen. Second: Oxygen is NOT produced. The end result biproducts of nitrate metabolism by denitrifying bacteria are N2 and H2O. I am not guessing here. nitrogen cycle: http://www.reefscapes.net/articles/a...ogencycle.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denitrification |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If Patterson believes that oxygen is removed by the enzyme and only N2 is
produced. What happens to the oxygen? Where do you/he think it goes? Do you think it stays in the enzyme? Not enzyme. Bacteria. Yes, that's exactly what happens. The oxygen is consumed by the bacteria. This might help your confusion: When you state that oxygen is consumed by the bacteria in the denitrification process where does it end up? where does it go? what form does it take? If your answer is not H2O you need to do more reading. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stoutman wrote:
I will write this again for the umpteen time. This process is called DENITRIFICATION. It is an enzymatic process that converts NO3- into H2O and N2 (O2 is NOT produced). And, once more, H2O is NOT produced. It is merely a carrier. George Patterson Coffee is only a way of stealing time that should by rights belong to your slightly older self. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
denitrators | Iain Miller | General | 4 | October 3rd 07 09:31 PM |
denitrators | bannor | Cichlids | 1 | February 19th 04 09:08 AM |
denitrators | Iain Miller | Cichlids | 0 | February 18th 04 11:55 PM |