![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Stock wrote:
"Altum" wrote in message .. . This kind of math problem is known as a mixing problem, and it's solved with differential equations. The algebraic model you're trying to use assumes that a is constant during the water change, but it's not. If you assume perfect mixing, constant water volume during the change, and no crap in the tap water, here's the basic system of differential equations where Crap(t) is the amount of crap in the water at t hours and gph is the rate you're changing water. dCrap/dt = crap fish add/hour - gph * (Crap(t)/tank volume in gallons) Crap(0) = initial amount of crap in the water From there, you integrate, plug in the initial condition an solve for Crap(t). However, I don't think you can assume perfect mixing. The equations get messy with imperfect mixing and you need information about the mixing rates to solve them. It's probably easiest to set the changer up for 20% a day and measure nitrates at the start and end of a week. Thanks Altum, but my Differential Equations class was more years ago then I care to remember. Sadly the dreaded Beer has erased all those brain cells. I'm assuming 35g of initial Crap (Nitrates), .15 g/hr of additional Nitrates, 140 gallons of water and 1 gallon per hour of additional water/outflow. I'm also assuming perfect mixing, although hoping to do better by adding the fresh water to the bottom of the sump (tall plastic barrel) and taking the old water from the top of the "sump". A math refresher would be appreciated if you have time. LOL! Setting these suckers up is a lot easier than solving them. My diffeq class was a few years ago, so I recognized the problem but it's been a while since I solved one. I used this web page to set the equations up. http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/AllBr...1/Modeling.asp There's a section on that website on solving first order linear equations too. I attempted a solution with your conditions and got: Crap(t) = 21 + 14 * e ^ -t/140 If I solved it right, with a continual 1 gph drip and perfect mixing, running the changer for 24 hours will drop the crap to from 35g to 32.8g. After a week, it will be at 25 grams. After three weeks the tank will stabilize at 21 grams of crap. For a continual drip, the most useful part of the solution is the constant, since as t gets large e ^ -t/140 approaches zero. The general equation for the constant is crap/hour * (140 gal/gph water change). It derives from the integrating factor used to solve the equation. You can use this if you want to change your crap/hour estimate (almost 50 ppm/week seems awfully high for a normal fish load) or want to estimate the crap left with different constant flow rates. If anyone finds an error, could you post the correction? This is useful enough that I may write it up for my website at http://fish.turquoisewave.com. -- Did you read the FAQ? http://faq.thekrib.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Altum" wrote in message . com... Bill Stock wrote: "Altum" wrote in message .. . This kind of math problem is known as a mixing problem, and it's solved with differential equations. The algebraic model you're trying to use assumes that a is constant during the water change, but it's not. If you assume perfect mixing, constant water volume during the change, and no crap in the tap water, here's the basic system of differential equations where Crap(t) is the amount of crap in the water at t hours and gph is the rate you're changing water. dCrap/dt = crap fish add/hour - gph * (Crap(t)/tank volume in gallons) Crap(0) = initial amount of crap in the water From there, you integrate, plug in the initial condition an solve for Crap(t). However, I don't think you can assume perfect mixing. The equations get messy with imperfect mixing and you need information about the mixing rates to solve them. It's probably easiest to set the changer up for 20% a day and measure nitrates at the start and end of a week. Thanks Altum, but my Differential Equations class was more years ago then I care to remember. Sadly the dreaded Beer has erased all those brain cells. I'm assuming 35g of initial Crap (Nitrates), .15 g/hr of additional Nitrates, 140 gallons of water and 1 gallon per hour of additional water/outflow. I'm also assuming perfect mixing, although hoping to do better by adding the fresh water to the bottom of the sump (tall plastic barrel) and taking the old water from the top of the "sump". A math refresher would be appreciated if you have time. LOL! Setting these suckers up is a lot easier than solving them. My diffeq class was a few years ago, so I recognized the problem but it's been a while since I solved one. I used this web page to set the equations up. http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/AllBr...1/Modeling.asp There's a section on that website on solving first order linear equations too. I attempted a solution with your conditions and got: Crap(t) = 21 + 14 * e ^ -t/140 If I solved it right, with a continual 1 gph drip and perfect mixing, running the changer for 24 hours will drop the crap to from 35g to 32.8g. After a week, it will be at 25 grams. After three weeks the tank will stabilize at 21 grams of crap. For a continual drip, the most useful part of the solution is the constant, since as t gets large e ^ -t/140 approaches zero. The general equation for the constant is crap/hour * (140 gal/gph water change). It derives from the integrating factor used to solve the equation. You can use this if you want to change your crap/hour estimate (almost 50 ppm/week seems awfully high for a normal fish load) or want to estimate the crap left with different constant flow rates. The Nitrates in the existing tank (75g) range between 40 and 80+, even with weekly 50% water changes, reduced feeding and gravel vaccing. The big guy (girl) must be close to 9" now and has a fair girth. I'm hoping the increased water volume/flow in the new system will let me keep it below 40. If anyone finds an error, could you post the correction? This is useful enough that I may write it up for my website at http://fish.turquoisewave.com. Thanks Altum, I'm a little surprised that it's 21. I had expected higher. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Stock wrote:
The Nitrates in the existing tank (75g) range between 40 and 80+, even with weekly 50% water changes, reduced feeding and gravel vaccing. The big guy (girl) must be close to 9" now and has a fair girth. I'm hoping the increased water volume/flow in the new system will let me keep it below 40. 21 grams of crap in 140 gallons comes in right around 40 ppm. Looks like you'll meet your goal with a lot less work. Thanks Altum, I'm a little surprised that it's 21. I had expected higher. Hope I solved the diffeq right! I'll be really curious to hear how the actual measurements turn out. Have you considered putting a cheap flourescent shop light over your sump and growing duckweed or anacharis to lower the nitrates? You could even harvest duckweed and feed it to the GF (mine love duckweed). -- Did you read the FAQ? http://faq.thekrib.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Altum" wrote in message . net... Bill Stock wrote: Hope I solved the diffeq right! I'll be really curious to hear how the actual measurements turn out. Yeah, I'm pretty sure you did. I ran the numbers through Excel and I came very close to the numbers produced by your equation. I assumed the reduction per hour for the additional Crap (.15) would be close to the average addition per hour. I got 25.15, you had 25.22. LOL. Have you considered putting a cheap flourescent shop light over your sump and growing duckweed or anacharis to lower the nitrates? You could even harvest duckweed and feed it to the GF (mine love duckweed). I considered some WH (Water Hyacinths) for the existing setup, but I would have had to use a Sump Pump and hang-on overflow for the plumbing. A little too much chance of a leak for my taste. The new sump is'nt a very good shape for growing plants, but should make a good settling tank. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Please Critique This Pond Advice | [email protected] | General | 4 | May 5th 06 02:56 AM |
water cooler, water coolers, water dispenser, water dispensers,bottleless water cooler,bottleless water coolers,bottleless water dispenser,bottleless water dispensers | water coolers | General | 0 | January 5th 06 09:09 AM |
water cooler, water coolers, water dispenser, water dispensers,bottleless water cooler,bottleless water coolers,bottleless water dispenser,bottleless water dispensers | water coolers | Reefs | 0 | January 5th 06 09:06 AM |
Rec.ponds FAQ | Snooze | General | 7 | April 11th 05 07:04 AM |
HELP massive fish die-off | Bill K | General | 7 | July 23rd 04 01:40 PM |