![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I will try this one more time. There is no good hobbiest measurement to
determine if they have enough light. Watts per gallon is meaningless. The only valid measurement is to measure the par. Since you think watts per gallon is a great measurement what corals can I keep in my friends 125 gallon tank with 175 watts of light on it? You still have not answered my question. Reread my question. Here I'll post it again: ********* Since you think that watts per gallon is not the best way to go, then tell us what method that *you* think hobbiest should use? Try to read this this time. Get a PAR meter and measure the PAR in the tank at the level you wish to add the coral, then find out if the coral will survive or thrive with that PAR amount. Please define this in such a way that any hobbiest can use your method to see if they have enough light :-) As I have said many times. There is no way that you can come up with any method that any hobbiest can use to see if they have enough light. Your watts per gallon method does not work. ********* Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets kim gross wrote on 1/6/2007 5:31 PM: Wayne Sallee wrote: hehehe I see that I have not gotten an answer from Kim on this :-) Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Wayne, I have answered this multiple times but for some reason you can't read the answer. The best measurement is to measure the par in your tank and then see what corals will survive with that par level. The only problem with this is that a par meter is not cheap. Now will you answer my question what corals can I keep in my 125 gallon tank with 175 watts of light on it? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Again,
NO watts per gallon is meaningless. If it means anything what corals can I keep in a 125 gallon tank with 175 watts of light on it? Can I keep Reef Crest Acropora corals in the tank, will Maxima Clams survive? Wayne Sallee wrote: So are you saying that watts per gallon is the best thing available for the average hobbiest? Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets kim gross wrote on 1/7/2007 5:44 AM: I will try this one more time. There is no good hobbiest measurement to determine if they have enough light. Watts per gallon is meaningless. The only valid measurement is to measure the par. Since you think watts per gallon is a great measurement what corals can I keep in my friends 125 gallon tank with 175 watts of light on it? You still have not answered my question. Reread my question. Here I'll post it again: ********* Since you think that watts per gallon is not the best way to go, then tell us what method that *you* think hobbiest should use? Try to read this this time. Get a PAR meter and measure the PAR in the tank at the level you wish to add the coral, then find out if the coral will survive or thrive with that PAR amount. Please define this in such a way that any hobbiest can use your method to see if they have enough light :-) As I have said many times. There is no way that you can come up with any method that any hobbiest can use to see if they have enough light. Your watts per gallon method does not work. ********* Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets kim gross wrote on 1/6/2007 5:31 PM: Wayne Sallee wrote: hehehe I see that I have not gotten an answer from Kim on this :-) Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Wayne, I have answered this multiple times but for some reason you can't read the answer. The best measurement is to measure the par in your tank and then see what corals will survive with that par level. The only problem with this is that a par meter is not cheap. Now will you answer my question what corals can I keep in my 125 gallon tank with 175 watts of light on it? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You keep saying that "watts per gallon is meaningless",
but you have no better answer. So that means that your statement is meaningless, because you obviously don't have an answer for hobbiest on how to decide on how much light to get. I, unlike you, do have an answer for hobiest on how to decide how much light to get. Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets kim gross wrote on 1/8/2007 10:36 PM: Again, NO watts per gallon is meaningless. If it means anything what corals can I keep in a 125 gallon tank with 175 watts of light on it? Can I keep Reef Crest Acropora corals in the tank, will Maxima Clams survive? Wayne Sallee wrote: So are you saying that watts per gallon is the best thing available for the average hobbiest? Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets kim gross wrote on 1/7/2007 5:44 AM: I will try this one more time. There is no good hobbiest measurement to determine if they have enough light. Watts per gallon is meaningless. The only valid measurement is to measure the par. Since you think watts per gallon is a great measurement what corals can I keep in my friends 125 gallon tank with 175 watts of light on it? You still have not answered my question. Reread my question. Here I'll post it again: ********* Since you think that watts per gallon is not the best way to go, then tell us what method that *you* think hobbiest should use? Try to read this this time. Get a PAR meter and measure the PAR in the tank at the level you wish to add the coral, then find out if the coral will survive or thrive with that PAR amount. Please define this in such a way that any hobbiest can use your method to see if they have enough light :-) As I have said many times. There is no way that you can come up with any method that any hobbiest can use to see if they have enough light. Your watts per gallon method does not work. ********* Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets kim gross wrote on 1/6/2007 5:31 PM: Wayne Sallee wrote: hehehe I see that I have not gotten an answer from Kim on this :-) Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Wayne, I have answered this multiple times but for some reason you can't read the answer. The best measurement is to measure the par in your tank and then see what corals will survive with that par level. The only problem with this is that a par meter is not cheap. Now will you answer my question what corals can I keep in my 125 gallon tank with 175 watts of light on it? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne Sallee wrote:
You keep saying that "watts per gallon is meaningless", but you have no better answer. So that means that your statement is meaningless, because you obviously don't have an answer for hobbiest on how to decide on how much light to get. I, unlike you, do have an answer for hobiest on how to decide how much light to get. Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Wayne, If watts per gallon gives you information on amount of light. What corals can I keep in a 125 gallon aquarium with 175 watts of light on it? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
kim gross wrote:
Wayne Sallee wrote: You keep saying that "watts per gallon is meaningless", but you have no better answer. So that means that your statement is meaningless, because you obviously don't have an answer for hobbiest on how to decide on how much light to get. I, unlike you, do have an answer for hobiest on how to decide how much light to get. Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Wayne, If watts per gallon gives you information on amount of light. What corals can I keep in a 125 gallon aquarium with 175 watts of light on it? HAH. Good point. Going by the rule of thumb, nothing dependant on sybiotic algae will survive well (this is only slighty more than 1 watt per gallon) However, if part of that 175w were, say for instance, a 150w metal halide, you could likely keep prteyy much whatever corals you wanted, if they are close enough to that light. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Add Homonym wrote:
kim gross wrote: Wayne Sallee wrote: You keep saying that "watts per gallon is meaningless", but you have no better answer. So that means that your statement is meaningless, because you obviously don't have an answer for hobbiest on how to decide on how much light to get. I, unlike you, do have an answer for hobiest on how to decide how much light to get. Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Wayne, If watts per gallon gives you information on amount of light. What corals can I keep in a 125 gallon aquarium with 175 watts of light on it? HAH. Good point. Going by the rule of thumb, nothing dependant on sybiotic algae will survive well (this is only slighty more than 1 watt per gallon) However, if part of that 175w were, say for instance, a 150w metal halide, you could likely keep prteyy much whatever corals you wanted, if they are close enough to that light. Exactly. This is a 6 foot long 125 that has a single 175 watt mh mounted in the middle of the tank with a single coral bommie under the light. It has mostly SPS corals in the tank that are doing fine. But if you use Waynes rules of course, it will not keep any SPS or clam alive, let alone any soft corals. But since it does not support Waynes watts per gallon rule he ignores it. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So if you did this, and you concentrated that light in say
a 35 gallon area, then you would have 5 watts per gallon, but if you were to spread that light evenly over the entire 125 gallon tank, you would have a hard time keeping that tank as a reef tank, so the watts per gallon rule still works. Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Add Homonym wrote on 1/10/2007 10:25 AM: kim gross wrote: Wayne Sallee wrote: You keep saying that "watts per gallon is meaningless", but you have no better answer. So that means that your statement is meaningless, because you obviously don't have an answer for hobbiest on how to decide on how much light to get. I, unlike you, do have an answer for hobiest on how to decide how much light to get. Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Wayne, If watts per gallon gives you information on amount of light. What corals can I keep in a 125 gallon aquarium with 175 watts of light on it? HAH. Good point. Going by the rule of thumb, nothing dependant on sybiotic algae will survive well (this is only slighty more than 1 watt per gallon) However, if part of that 175w were, say for instance, a 150w metal halide, you could likely keep prteyy much whatever corals you wanted, if they are close enough to that light. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne Sallee wrote:
So are you saying that watts per gallon is the best thing available for the average hobbiest? Wayne, why do I get this feeling that you have several ex-wives? --Kurt |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
KurtG wrote:
Wayne, why do I get this feeling that you have several ex-wives? Why do you think that several women would marry him? :-) George Patterson Forgive your enemies. But always remember who they are. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
55 watts of light for 26 gallon ? | Dukester | Plants | 2 | November 18th 05 03:53 AM |
pleco per gallon rule? | spiral_72 | General | 7 | February 7th 05 06:38 PM |
How many watts per gallon do I need with T5? | James Smith | General | 12 | October 23rd 04 04:08 PM |
How many watts per gallon do I need with T5? | James Smith | Plants | 12 | October 23rd 04 04:08 PM |
How many watts per gallon with metal halide lighting | Scott Rogahn | Plants | 1 | May 30th 04 12:36 PM |