![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Phyllis and Jim" wrote in message ups.com... I teach research methodology to family therapy students. Your questions are right on target when we are in the threats to validity section of the course. We spend time thinking of all sorts of things that could possibly influence the outcome. Professional research generally tries to describe the limitations of the work to guide future researchers. I also push my students to asses the threats as to the magnitude of their probable influence. This set of decisions is harder to make and imprecise because so much is unknown. A good class will produce hundreds of possible threats, more than can be controlled unless the researcher has nearly infinite financing. The result often reduces the number of clearly-relevant-and-significantly-impactful threats. We also discuss the magnitude of threat to validity that we would consider to be important. If we were examining frequency of dyed hair among clients, we could allow lots of threats to go by. If we were testing medication with lethal side effects, we would want to run down lots more of the threats. My guess is that koi/goldfish research will provide us with some answers to some of your questions. If Jan can find some research, we could look at it in terms of possible threats to validity. Your questions about who paid for the research are certainly on target. Statistics has a bunch of sayings: 'Garbage in, garbage out' describes the effect of poor data collection. 'There are liars, damned liars and statisticians' describes manipulative use of research. I am sure we will all look at nutrition studies carefully. Jim ======================== Well said and worth repeating, so no brevity snips. Meanwhile until more is known I'll feed them as I did before. I'll save myself over $200 a year and have fry with enough weight to see them through our zone 6 winters. The filters were no cleaner either on the $5 lb food. I wonder if anyone really knows what koi and goldfish live on in the wild. From my observations over the years they appear to be omnivores. If they can get it in their mouth and swallow it, they'll eat it with the exception if fish fry. I also remember the beautiful huge koi at Flushing Meadow Corona Park in the 1970s. They thrived on a diet of popcorn, bits of hot-dogs and hot-dog buns, whatever "junk food" people tossed in to them... plus whatever natural food existed in the water course. BTW, I went back to that zoo last Sept. We didn't see any, but they had redone the entire zoo area. -- RM.... Frugal ponding since 1995. rec.ponder since late 1996. My Pond & Aquarium Pages: http://tinyurl.com/9do58 ~~~~ }((((* ~~~ }{{{{(ö ~~~ }(((((o |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Storing Dry Fish Food | [-=LÈGIÖN=-] | General | 0 | August 7th 06 01:12 AM |
Rose anenome splitting | TW | Reefs | 87 | April 15th 06 03:04 AM |
Just how much food is too much? | Ryan Minaker | General | 8 | March 23rd 04 04:10 AM |
Purposely sinking food? | Jan Sacharuk | Goldfish | 3 | September 27th 03 03:24 PM |
Large Flake Food | NetMax | Cichlids | 0 | September 7th 03 03:51 AM |