A Fishkeeping forum. FishKeepingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishKeepingBanter.com forum » rec.aquaria.freshwater » Plants
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

NO3 level and growth of aquatic plant ref: Paul Krombholz 1966



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 26th 07, 02:02 AM posted to rec.aquaria.freshwater.plants
Richard Sexton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 135
Default NO3 level and growth of aquatic plant ref: Paul Krombholz 1966

In article . com,
wrote:
There are no known detrimental effects on plants at extreme levels(NH4
is quite another matter), fish and the most sensitive will be Amano
shrimps etc.

I used these shrimp in a toxicity study, I found no adversed effects
at 160ppm(the limit of the test method, it was likely higher). No fish
or plant impacts where noted. I used KNO3 to dose, as did Paul.


I slipped a decimal once and dosed at 200 ppm of know instead of 20.

I let it go for 3 weeks to see what would happen. The tips of a couple
of crypts curled a little bit but the 16 ammano shrimp were unaffected.

--
Need Mercedes parts? http://parts.mbz.org
Richard Sexton | Mercedes stuff: http://mbz.org
1970 280SE, 72 280SE | Home pages: http://rs79.vrx.net
633CSi 250SE/C 300SD | http://aquaria.net http://killi.net
  #2  
Old March 26th 07, 05:48 PM posted to rec.aquaria.freshwater.plants
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 65
Default NO3 level and growth of aquatic plant ref: Paul Krombholz 1966

On Mar 25, 6:02 pm, (Richard Sexton) wrote:
In article . com,

wrote:
There are no known detrimental effects on plants at extreme levels(NH4
is quite another matter), fish and the most sensitive will be Amano
shrimps etc.


I used these shrimp in a toxicity study, I found no adversed effects
at 160ppm(the limit of the test method, it was likely higher). No fish
or plant impacts where noted. I used KNO3 to dose, as did Paul.


I slipped a decimal once and dosed at 200 ppm of know instead of 20.

I let it go for 3 weeks to see what would happen. The tips of a couple
of crypts curled a little bit but the 16 ammano shrimp were unaffected.

--
Need Mercedes parts? http://parts.mbz.org
Richard Sexton | Mercedes stuff:http://mbz.org
1970 280SE, 72 280SE | Home pages:http://rs79.vrx.net
633CSi 250SE/C 300SD |http://aquaria.nethttp://killi.net


Well, 3 weeks is a good time frame.
I just did a 3 day acute, but that did not address the fish waste and
other residual NO3, that's just what was added on top of what was
there, added internally.

I know that it was at least 160ppm, my the method did not go beyond
that.
Good old fashion accidents that should cause algae, dead fish etc
occur a lot, but observations etc help a lot and them following them
up.

Regards,
Tom Barr


Regards,
Tom Barr


  #3  
Old March 26th 07, 05:53 PM posted to rec.aquaria.freshwater.plants
Richard Sexton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 135
Default NO3 level and growth of aquatic plant ref: Paul Krombholz 1966

In article .com,
wrote:
On Mar 25, 6:02 pm, (Richard Sexton) wrote:
In article . com,

wrote:
There are no known detrimental effects on plants at extreme levels(NH4
is quite another matter), fish and the most sensitive will be Amano
shrimps etc.


I used these shrimp in a toxicity study, I found no adversed effects
at 160ppm(the limit of the test method, it was likely higher). No fish
or plant impacts where noted. I used KNO3 to dose, as did Paul.


I slipped a decimal once and dosed at 200 ppm of know instead of 20.

I let it go for 3 weeks to see what would happen. The tips of a couple
of crypts curled a little bit but the 16 ammano shrimp were unaffected.

Well, 3 weeks is a good time frame.
I just did a 3 day acute, but that did not address the fish waste and
other residual NO3, that's just what was added on top of what was
there, added internally.


I should also point out that although these 16 shrimp survived 3 weeks
at 200 ppm nitrate with zero obervable effect, the same is NOT true
for ammonia.

A few months later I got a large number of emerse grown crypts and put them
in the same tank. Of course the first thing an emersed crypt does underwater
is let its leaves melt and rot. One day 2/4 of the shrimp appeared dead
and white - not pink. I moed them all to a clean tank and nearly all recovered.

The ammonia level in that tank BARELY registered on my test kit.

So yeah, nitrate good, ammonia bad. The fish and plants didn't care, but
the shrimp are much more sensitive.

--
Need Mercedes parts? http://parts.mbz.org
Richard Sexton | Mercedes stuff: http://mbz.org
1970 280SE, 72 280SE | Home pages: http://rs79.vrx.net
633CSi 250SE/C 300SD | http://aquaria.net http://killi.net
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Phosphate reduction, and plant growth? Scott Plants 2 March 2nd 05 02:52 PM
Plant growth questions Chameleon Plants 5 January 18th 05 12:41 PM
wattage for plant growth Mandy General 17 December 28th 04 01:42 AM
Plant Growth Craig Brye Plants 2 July 20th 04 11:43 PM
Why good plant growth= bad algae growth [email protected] Plants 2 February 22nd 04 10:45 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishKeepingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.