![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Lies lies and more lies.......typical though from a moderator of rpm.....they do not block they follow the charter....yea right and folks in hell get ice cream and cold beer on a daily basis too. What do you expect though for a group founded by a hipocrite of a preacher man that has goals like Rev. Jim Jones did...... On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 18:52:56 -0500, Galen Hekhuis wrote: Early on, before we even got around to the first draft of the RFD, the subject of "blacklisting" or blocking posters based on IP number, nym, or any of a number of different criteria. The suggestion was met with a resounding "NO." Even if someone were to hold hostage and threaten to kill a cute kitten unless we "blacklisted" someone, we still wouldn't block a poster. We aren't even looking at ways to do it, so we may not even be able to do it even if we wanted to. If a post is civil and about ponds, there is little doubt that it would be approved, no matter who submitted it. Let me make it perfectly clear, we will allow anyone to post no matter how many cute kittens someone threatens to kill. There are NO plans to moderate RPM on anything other than content. Of course, if someone threatens cute bunnies we may have to rethink that... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Blocking senders | A. Paul. Ing | Goldfish | 0 | June 25th 07 08:51 PM |
Blocking senders | Galen Hekhuis | General | 43 | December 28th 06 02:24 AM |