![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"There are no atheists in foxholes"
U.S. backs churches in atheist fight July 19, 2007 BY DAVID ASHENFELTER FREE PRESS STAFF WRITER The U.S. Department of Justice has waded into a legal brawl between a national atheist group and the Detroit Downtown Development Authority, which pledged $734,570 in grants to three historic churches in a major downtown face-lift in time for the 2006 Super Bowl. A federal judge in Detroit is expected to rule soon in the case, which could have national implications as to what role the government has in helping to preserve historic churches. Advertisement American Atheists Inc. sued Detroit's DDA in U.S. District Court last year, saying the grants violated the constitutional separation between church and state. The DDA pledged the money to the churches as partial reimbursement for improvements the churches made to their properties. "The churches should be paying for those projects, not taxpayers," American Atheists President Ellen Johnson told the Free Press last week. She said the projects amount to public support of religion. But the development authority, the churches and their recent ally, the Justice Department's Civil Division, say the funds, which the churches haven't received, don't involve Bibles, prayer books or religious indoctrination -- only grants that enabled the churches to participate in a program that helped downtown property owners spruce up their property. They compared the grants to communities providing police and fire protection for churches. "It's been nightmarish," said the Rev. Kevin Turman, pastor of Second Baptist Church in Greektown. He and other pastors said that without the grants, which were due more than a year ago, the churches have been forced to renegotiate loans, pay more interest and divert funds from church projects. The decision is expected to come soon from U.S. District Judge Avern Cohn. The Justice Department said an adverse ruling could jeopardize future national preservation grants to historic churches. Justice Department lawyer Kathryn Wyer told Cohn that the federal government has long recognized the importance of preserving national historic church sites. In 2003, she said, the National Parks Service awarded the Old North Church in Boston a $317,000 grant to restore its windows. The church, occupied by an Episcopal congregation, was made famous in April 1775 when its sexton displayed two lanterns from the steeple to warn American Revolutionary War patriot Paul Revere that the British were advancing on Lexington, Mass. "Federal bricks-and-mortar programs serve important secular interests in preserving our national heritage and in providing tangible assistance after major catastrophes," Wyer told Cohn in court papers in April. She declined to be interviewed. "Detroit's program, while on a smaller scale than these federal programs, similarly serves the important purpose of bringing a downtown area back to life," Wyer added. American Atheists Inc., a New Jersey nonprofit founded in the 1960s by the legendary late atheist Madalyn Murray O'Hair, sued the authority in April 2006, after learning of the grants to Central United Methodist Church and St. John's Episcopal Church on Woodward near the Fox Theatre, and Second Baptist Church on Monroe. The churches used the grant pledges to obtain $1.7 million in loans to repair their building facades and parking lots and make other improvements. Property owners were offered 50% reimbursement -- up to $150,000 for building facades and $30,000 for parking lots -- to improve their property. The grants, totaling $11.5 million, were designed to generate $23 million in improvements. "We agreed to provide assistance to the churches, not as churches but as property owners," said Art Papapanos, vice president of the Detroit Economic Growth Corp., which is affiliated with the DDA. "We didn't differentiate between whether it was religious, political, private or government entity." Authority lawyers argued that the church projects complied with U.S. Supreme Court decisions allowing governments to award grants to religious organizations if the grants don't advance or inhibit religion or result in religious indoctrination. The atheist group was joined in its suit by Steve Walker, a political science professor at Wayne County Community College, and Dennis Vatsis, a Detroit lawyer who lives in West Bloomfield. "I have nothing against these churches, but why would I want to subsidize them with my tax money?" asked Walker. Added Vatsis: "I'm just tired of working 60 hours a week to fund these government schemes to dole out my tax money, particularly when we have a constitutional prohibition against it." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "bobandcarole" wrote in message oups.com... "There are no atheists in foxholes" There are no atheists. Atheists believe in God, but just believe in what he is, rather than what people say about him. Some people call themselves atheists, but they don't even know what the word atheist means. People use words that they don't understand to try to sound impressive. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 28, 7:55 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote:
"bobandcarole" wrote in message oups.com... "There are no atheists in foxholes" There are no atheists. Atheists believe in God, but just believe in what he is, rather than what people say about him. Some people call themselves atheists, but they don't even know what the word atheist means. People use words that they don't understand to try to sound impressive. In your case, that would be any words. Atheist - without a deity. I don't believe in a deity, therefore I am atheist. Simple as that. -- Lucifer the Unsubtle, EAC Librarian of Dark Tomes of Excessive Evil and General Purpose Igor The Anti-Theist, BAAWA Lowly Evilmeister and tamer of the Demon Duck of Doom Convicted by Earthquack "Don't worry, I won't bite.......hard" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lucifer" wrote in message oups.com... On Jul 28, 7:55 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "bobandcarole" wrote in message oups.com... "There are no atheists in foxholes" There are no atheists. Atheists believe in God, but just believe in what he is, rather than what people say about him. Some people call themselves atheists, but they don't even know what the word atheist means. People use words that they don't understand to try to sound impressive. In your case, that would be any words. Atheist - without a deity. I don't believe in a deity, therefore I am atheist. Simple as that. Yes you do, you just don't know what you are saying when you use that word, deity. It encompasses more than you now realize. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 28, 3:22 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote:
"Lucifer" wrote in message oups.com... On Jul 28, 7:55 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "bobandcarole" wrote in message roups.com... "There are no atheists in foxholes" There are no atheists. Atheists believe in God, but just believe in what he is, rather than what people say about him. Some people call themselves atheists, but they don't even know what the word atheist means. People use words that they don't understand to try to sound impressive. In your case, that would be any words. Atheist - without a deity. I don't believe in a deity, therefore I am atheist. Simple as that. Yes you do, you just don't know what you are saying when you use that word, deity. It encompasses more than you now realize. You are an idiot. Don't you DARE tell us what we do or don't believe. I do not believe in any kind of god. I have never seen evidence of a god. If you have evidence, present it. If you want to redefine the word 'god' so that it no longer means anything, then go right ahead. We are not obligated to pay any attention to you. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Conspiracy of Doves" wrote in message oups.com... On Jul 28, 3:22 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "Lucifer" wrote in message oups.com... On Jul 28, 7:55 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "bobandcarole" wrote in message roups.com... "There are no atheists in foxholes" There are no atheists. Atheists believe in God, but just believe in what he is, rather than what people say about him. Some people call themselves atheists, but they don't even know what the word atheist means. People use words that they don't understand to try to sound impressive. In your case, that would be any words. Atheist - without a deity. I don't believe in a deity, therefore I am atheist. Simple as that. Yes you do, you just don't know what you are saying when you use that word, deity. It encompasses more than you now realize. You are an idiot. Don't you DARE tell us what we do or don't believe. No need to get your feathers all ruffled. I am only expanding your horizons, and taking away your fear of what you know may happen if God does turn out to in fact be real. I do not believe in any kind of god. I have never seen evidence of a god. If you have evidence, present it. If you want to redefine the word 'god' so that it no longer means anything, then go right ahead. We are not obligated to pay any attention to you. God is not redefined. He has always been things atheist believe in, like light, intelligence, compassion, and perfection. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 14:22:22 -0500, "Mark Earnest"
wrote: "Lucifer" wrote in message roups.com... On Jul 28, 7:55 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "bobandcarole" wrote in message oups.com... "There are no atheists in foxholes" There are no atheists. Atheists believe in God, but just believe in what he is, rather than what people say about him. Some people call themselves atheists, but they don't even know what the word atheist means. People use words that they don't understand to try to sound impressive. In your case, that would be any words. Atheist - without a deity. I don't believe in a deity, therefore I am atheist. Simple as that. Yes you do, you just don't know what you are saying when you use that word, deity. Well, enlighten us. It encompasses more than you now realize. See above. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Daniel Kolle" wrote in message ... On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 14:22:22 -0500, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "Lucifer" wrote in message roups.com... On Jul 28, 7:55 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "bobandcarole" wrote in message oups.com... "There are no atheists in foxholes" There are no atheists. Atheists believe in God, but just believe in what he is, rather than what people say about him. Some people call themselves atheists, but they don't even know what the word atheist means. People use words that they don't understand to try to sound impressive. In your case, that would be any words. Atheist - without a deity. I don't believe in a deity, therefore I am atheist. Simple as that. Yes you do, you just don't know what you are saying when you use that word, deity. Well, enlighten us. A deity, any deity, is a being that transcends the normal. We interact with them every time we dwell upon the unusual, the mysterious, or the perfect. It encompasses more than you now realize. See above. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 14:22:22 -0500, Mark Earnest wrote:
"Lucifer" wrote in message oups.com... On Jul 28, 7:55 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "bobandcarole" wrote in message oups.com... "There are no atheists in foxholes" There are no atheists. Atheists believe in God, but just believe in what he is, rather than what people say about him. Some people call themselves atheists, but they don't even know what the word atheist means. People use words that they don't understand to try to sound impressive. In your case, that would be any words. Atheist - without a deity. I don't believe in a deity, therefore I am atheist. Simple as that. Yes you do, you just don't know what you are saying when you use that word, deity. It encompasses more than you now realize. I'm curious. Do you understand that every single person in alt.atheism thinks you have serious mental problems? Do you get understand that at all? -- Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423 EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion ------------------------------------------------------------ "Just because it's inexplicted doesn't mean it's inexplicable." - Dr. House |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mark Earnest wrote: "Lucifer" wrote in message oups.com... On Jul 28, 7:55 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "bobandcarole" wrote in message oups.com... "There are no atheists in foxholes" There are no atheists. Atheists believe in God, but just believe in what he is, rather than what people say about him. Some people call themselves atheists, but they don't even know what the word atheist means. People use words that they don't understand to try to sound impressive. In your case, that would be any words. Atheist - without a deity. I don't believe in a deity, therefore I am atheist. Simple as that. Yes you do, you just don't know what you are saying when you use that word, deity. It encompasses more than you now realize. ...............so speaks the typical 'Brainwashed one' |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Potrait of the president for secular and atheist education in TN.. tha court! | ~Roy~ | General | 0 | June 28th 05 03:54 AM |
Abortion and the Bible: an Atheist viewpoint | rogue | General | 0 | June 18th 05 01:28 AM |
Abortion and the Bible: an Atheist viewpoint | Ray Fischer | General | 0 | June 17th 05 02:28 AM |
What is a real atheist? | Ordog | General | 7 | June 1st 05 12:09 PM |