![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I still have to disagree - the buildup of crud on the plates is actually the
bacteria colonies - they're a PITA to clean off the plates when a tank is stripped down, but they don't cause any harm. While I have heard tales of the "toxic gas buildup" caused by UGF, I've never experienced it, and knowing the details of what it takes to cause it to happen, I find it very unlikely (OK, practically impossible) for it to happen - even without maintenance. No I know has experienced it either. Considering what it takes for this scenario to occur in the natural world, it would be practically impossible to hve it happen in a tank, even if you were trying to create it. Also, the chemistry that is needed to cause the "toxic bubble" would kill everything in the tank way before there was the possibility of enough toxic gas developing to actually make a bubble.... Without maintenance, I can easily imagine an UGF getting matted an clogged (actually, its the gravel that get clogged), but all that would really do is make the filter inneffective - it wouldn't make the gravel any worse than it would be without the UGF in place. Of course, as soon as the gravel was vacuumed or stirred up, the filter would kick back in , and the bacteria would repopulate the gravel pretty quickly. I would also reiterate that a UGF is not meant to be the sole filter in a tank. If that is how you were using them, I can understand why you would have had problems with them. (even with a sponge filter, all you are really providing is bio filtration - nothing else). Another factor that may be causing you problems is the size of your tanks. Bigger tanks are always more stable than small tanks, and a lot of the filter advances that have occurred over the past decade or so relate to trying to make smaller tanks more stable, making possible to have a larger carrying capacity (more fish per gallon), and making it easier to keep both fish and plants in the same tank. 20 years ago, all of these were labour intesive, and prone to error - the smaller the tank, the more likely it would be for an error to occur, and quickly spiral out of control. The new technologies have made it much easier to keep small tanks with lots of fish and plants, but they do not necesarily perform better than some of the older technologies - it really depends on what you want from your tank. powerheads and high throughput canister filters are not very good for a pond or lake setup - for fish that do not live in an environement with currents. UGF and low-throughput filters are much better for these tanks, as they can be run wothout creating alot of current. They ca move a lot of water through the filter media (gravel) without introducing a current to the overall tank. For a current environment (stream or river), powerheads and high throughput filters are great - you want all of that flow to create the currents that the fish "expect". In those environments, an UGF provides some ectra buffering of the biological filtration (I am a proponent of the "more is better" school of thought on biofilters). I must admit that I have never bothered to keep small tanks (I consider a 5gal to be a fry tank). I would suspect that on the tiny 1,2,3 gallon tanks, an UGF probably wouldn't make a huge difference - by the time you had a deep enough gravel bed (2" min.), you would have taken up a lot of the tank volume with gravel. In those tiny tanks, keeping the water volume as high as possible is probably the most critical thing, so exxternal filtration would probably be the way to go . Not only would the filtration not be taking up tank volume, it would be adding ot hte total water volume by providing an exterior "resevoir" in the filter itself.... "Tynk" wrote in message ps.com... On Oct 9, 7:20?am, "jd" wrote: Yeah, I can relate with the cleaning of the crud off th e plates, but I only do that when I'm tearing atank down, which is hardly ever now. Since I'm not doing commercial or research work any more, my tanks are all recreational, and I don't have to tear them down unless there is a good reason. I have tanks that have been going for 6 years without a teardown, and they're rock solid..... -JD - Show quoted text - As you and RM mentioned...the crud under the plates is my biggest *con* when it comes to using them. (Pay no attention JD to the troll tailing me...we are simply discussing the pros and cons of them and he has to make it into something it's not...sorry *for* him). It's that crud that is basically a ticking time bomb. Often an area of it becomes a toxic cess pool that can release a toxic gas bubble into the tank. Yeah, I know that sounds pretty stupid, but it does happen and it can kill fish. Now that doesn't mean they're all like that, as proper maintenance plays a huge part. However, in reality not too many are. Another *con* for me is when there is a breakdown (either pump failure, clog, or powerhead failure) and it can turn into a bigger problem. I wonder if it has to do with the crud under the plates in addition to dying bacteria? Maybe it's because the canister isn't actually inside the tank and a malfunctioning canister is somewhat contained. I like the canisters that also have a biowheel. For folks who don't want a lot of added noise in the same room as a large tank, such as a tv room or family room, etc...it's a better choice than an UGF. If noise and less equipment running isn't a concern, and they're properly maintained, then sure...they have their purpose. I can't deny them that. I just find them to be a pain in the butt, and there to be better, less noisy options out there. I remember years ago taking out the UGF in my 29g (back then my tanks were either run by an UGF or sponge filter or both), and taking that first step away from them. It was scary for me, as well as for many long time hobbyists. After realizing there was no downfall, no *con* without it, only good things...I've never used since. I actually toss out the new ones that come with tank set ups, and replace it with a power filter. Heck, even those have a long way too! Now they have mini power filters for tiny 1g tanks. Filtration has come a long way recently, and I just wish they would have done it years ago. = ) When I had angels and betta spawns going, those mini power filters on the juvie male betta male tanks would have been so usefull! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
guppies underground filter | Nikki | General | 1 | April 9th 06 11:24 PM |
Wet & dry filters ? | martin | Reefs | 6 | May 5th 05 05:42 AM |
filters | uvdoc | General | 3 | April 24th 05 07:59 PM |
CO2 and Filters | Nitesbane | Plants | 2 | October 26th 04 10:10 PM |
Veggie Filters vs UV Filters ?? | Bette E | General | 38 | May 3rd 04 07:49 AM |