![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not sure I would call it ignorance, as I have spent alarge part of my
life designing large and small filtration units, and have an excelelnt understanding of fliud dynamics and how filtration works. In any case, while powerheads can increase the flow through an UGF, a properly set up and maintained airstone can (and does) provide an excellent water flow. as an example, in one of my tanks the air lift tubes creates a little over 6" of lift (this is about average for my tanks). There are 6 lift tubes (it's a 125 gal), so summed together that is a lot of water flow. Even though a power head may provide a bit more flow, more is not always better, and I have ben very satisfied with the results at these flow rates. I have played around with power heads, and unless I ma trying to create a current in the tank, I don't see any significant advantage. -JD "eekamouse" wrote in message ups.com... On Oct 9, 1:30 pm, atomweaver wrote: Tynk wrote oups.com: On Oct 9, 7:20?am, "jd" wrote: Yeah, I can relate with the cleaning of the crud off th e plates, but I only do that when I'm tearing atank down, which is hardly ever now. Since I'm not doing commercial or research work any more, my tanks are all recreational, and I don't have to tear them down unless there is a good reason. I have tanks that have been going for 6 years without a teardown, and they're rock solid..... -JD - Show quoted text - As you and RM mentioned...the crud under the plates is my biggest *con* when it comes to using them. (Pay no attention JD to the troll tailing me...we are simply discussing the pros and cons of them and he has to make it into something it's not...sorry *for* him). It's that crud that is basically a ticking time bomb. Often an area of it becomes a toxic cess pool that can release a toxic gas bubble into the tank. I'm not big on fluid dynamics, but it seems totally plausible to me that JD was holding such a bubble in a static location (a "dead" corner?) under the UGF with the flow from his air pump, and the failure of the pump is what allowed it to diffuse into the tank. THe rapidity with which his water quality dropped (2 days, IIRC) indicates more than just normal metabolic action of some fish in a heavily planted tank. JD's story may actually be another indictment of UG filters, as that rapid drop in water quality might not have occurred if the UGF wasn't there, but I guess not enough is known to say for sure. DaveZ- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The biggest problem is ignorance in how and what makes a UGF work, and unless the bio load is light you need much more than an air pump to get decent flow under the filter grates. The only way is with a decent powerhead in place of the airstone or bubblers. Reverse flow works fine too.............air powered tend to have dead spots, forced flow (powerheads) do not tend to have dead spots. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
guppies underground filter | Nikki | General | 1 | April 9th 06 11:24 PM |
Wet & dry filters ? | martin | Reefs | 6 | May 5th 05 05:42 AM |
filters | uvdoc | General | 3 | April 24th 05 07:59 PM |
CO2 and Filters | Nitesbane | Plants | 2 | October 26th 04 10:10 PM |
Veggie Filters vs UV Filters ?? | Bette E | General | 38 | May 3rd 04 07:49 AM |