![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Because it binds with the calcium, thus keeping it
in the water, but it also keeps the corals from taking it out of the water. :-) Wayne Sallee KurtG wrote on 11/28/2007 9:50 AM: Wayne Sallee wrote: I did some experimenting with putting granulated sulfur in a bag in the sump. I also continued doing the lime drip. I found that the sulfur did a great job of raising both the calcium levels, and the alkalinity levels. It also did a great job of keeping the corals from taking the calcium out of the water. :-) Huh? Why would sulfur increase Ca levels? I've heard of Nitrate reactors running the effluent through Ca material to reduce acidity which would release some Ca. I think that was because of a high load of CO2 and HS. ---Kurt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne Sallee wrote:
Because it binds with the calcium, thus keeping it in the water, but it also keeps the corals from taking it out of the water. :-) Isn't the whole idea behind keeping the calcium levels high to allow the corals to use it? George Patterson Worry doesn't improve the future; it just ruins the present. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
George Patterson wrote on 11/28/2007 10:39 PM:
Wayne Sallee wrote: Because it binds with the calcium, thus keeping it in the water, but it also keeps the corals from taking it out of the water. :-) Isn't the whole idea behind keeping the calcium levels high to allow the corals to use it? George Patterson Worry doesn't improve the future; it just ruins the present. Yep, and that's why I discontinued the experiment. :-) Wayne Sallee |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interestingly, slight increases in sulfur improved
coralline algae growth, but this quickly became a negative factor as sulfur levels increased. Wayne Sallee Wayne Sallee wrote on 11/29/2007 8:31 AM: George Patterson wrote on 11/28/2007 10:39 PM: Wayne Sallee wrote: Because it binds with the calcium, thus keeping it in the water, but it also keeps the corals from taking it out of the water. :-) Isn't the whole idea behind keeping the calcium levels high to allow the corals to use it? George Patterson Worry doesn't improve the future; it just ruins the present. Yep, and that's why I discontinued the experiment. :-) Wayne Sallee |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Popeye revisited | glassman | Cichlids | 0 | July 14th 06 04:23 AM |
koi ulcer,, revisited | *muffin* | General | 15 | July 1st 05 08:15 PM |
Mystery disease revisited. | Mean_Chlorine | General | 2 | October 5th 04 09:37 PM |
Cloudy 1-mo tank Revisited | Adam Gottschalk | General | 6 | May 5th 04 02:05 AM |
new location revisited | J.D. Stone | General | 0 | January 2nd 04 05:47 PM |