![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 29, 11:58 pm, George Patterson wrote:
Big Habeeb wrote: Well, the skimmer I have is an oceanic, though I dunno what model. It has an adjustable air hose, a hose on the side that I can raise or lower to raise or lower the level of the bubbles in the skimmer etc...but no matter how high and wide open I set the thing, I can't seem to get it to bubble over into the cup. It's still pulling a decent amount of scumminess out, so I'm not terribly concerned, but I'd like to get it up and running in its intended way before my bioload DOES get higher. Sounds like it's working correctly and your water is pretty clean. The level of the top of the foam is not important - what's important is the level of the top of the water column. The water level should be about 1/2" below the base of the column at the top of the skimmer. The range on this should be between 1/4" to 3/4" below the base. If the water level is lower, either the water pump (usually a powerhead) is undersized or it's malfunctioning for some reason. Also make sure that the airstone is still ok - they wear out. As long as it's producing a fair amount of tiny bubbles, it's ok. When they wear out, the bubbles get bigger and fewer. Mine last no more than 6 months. If the pump keeps the water level ok, and the airstone is putting out well, you just don't have a lot of waste products to remove. One last thing. The air powered skimmers such as you and I have don't produce as much foamate as the venturi models. I would say not to worry about it. The venturi models are noisier, which is why I stay with the air-driven skimmers. George Patterson Worry doesn't improve the future; it just ruins the present. George, Thanks for setting my mind at ease. The water certainly tests as clean, and for a 72 gallon tank my bioload is very small right now...8 snails, 6 hermits, ocellaris clown (sp), golden headed sleeper goby, PJ cardinal, and a cleaner shrimp...so yeah, to respond to another poster, there isn't much 'poop' in the tank. I've also done my best not to overfeed, putting in only a tiny pinch of food twice a day. Seems that just about everyhting I put in gets snapped up between the clown, card, and shrimp. Going this weekend to the LFS to add some more snails to help a bit more with the algae situation, and potentially adding a hippo tang as well (if they have any smaller ones...I know they get quite large, but I'd like to start off with it a bit smaller...and according to the LFS, its rare to find juvenile hippos this time of year). Mitch |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() George, Thanks for setting my mind at ease. The water certainly tests as clean, and for a 72 gallon tank my bioload is very small right now...8 snails, 6 hermits, ocellaris clown (sp), golden headed sleeper goby, PJ cardinal, and a cleaner shrimp...so yeah, to respond to another poster, there isn't much 'poop' in the tank. I've also done my best not to overfeed, putting in only a tiny pinch of food twice a day. Seems that just about everyhting I put in gets snapped up between the clown, card, and shrimp. Going this weekend to the LFS to add some more snails to help a bit more with the algae situation, and potentially adding a hippo tang as well (if they have any smaller ones...I know they get quite large, but I'd like to start off with it a bit smaller...and according to the LFS, its rare to find juvenile hippos this time of year). Mitch Are you poo pooing my "poop"? :-) Was that the first skimmer you had on your tank? Jim |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 30, 11:15 am, "jthread" wrote:
George, Thanks for setting my mind at ease. The water certainly tests as clean, and for a 72 gallon tank my bioload is very small right now...8 snails, 6 hermits, ocellaris clown (sp), golden headed sleeper goby, PJ cardinal, and a cleaner shrimp...so yeah, to respond to another poster, there isn't much 'poop' in the tank. I've also done my best not to overfeed, putting in only a tiny pinch of food twice a day. Seems that just about everyhting I put in gets snapped up between the clown, card, and shrimp. Going this weekend to the LFS to add some more snails to help a bit more with the algae situation, and potentially adding a hippo tang as well (if they have any smaller ones...I know they get quite large, but I'd like to start off with it a bit smaller...and according to the LFS, its rare to find juvenile hippos this time of year). Mitch Are you poo pooing my "poop"? :-) Was that the first skimmer you had on your tank? Jim- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Jim, Not at all, I enjoyed the 'poop' reference. Yes, this is my first skimmer...I've never needed one because I've never done a reef tank prior to this one, so the technology is a bit new to me...to the point hwere when my LFS pulled one out, I was trying to figure out why he was selling me a bong to go with my tank. Mitch |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Big Habeeb" wrote in message ... On Nov 30, 11:15 am, "jthread" wrote: George, Thanks for setting my mind at ease. The water certainly tests as clean, and for a 72 gallon tank my bioload is very small right now...8 snails, 6 hermits, ocellaris clown (sp), golden headed sleeper goby, PJ cardinal, and a cleaner shrimp...so yeah, to respond to another poster, there isn't much 'poop' in the tank. I've also done my best not to overfeed, putting in only a tiny pinch of food twice a day. Seems that just about everyhting I put in gets snapped up between the clown, card, and shrimp. Going this weekend to the LFS to add some more snails to help a bit more with the algae situation, and potentially adding a hippo tang as well (if they have any smaller ones...I know they get quite large, but I'd like to start off with it a bit smaller...and according to the LFS, its rare to find juvenile hippos this time of year). Mitch Are you poo pooing my "poop"? :-) Was that the first skimmer you had on your tank? Jim- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Jim, Not at all, I enjoyed the 'poop' reference. Yes, this is my first skimmer...I've never needed one because I've never done a reef tank prior to this one, so the technology is a bit new to me...to the point hwere when my LFS pulled one out, I was trying to figure out why he was selling me a bong to go with my tank. Mitch Bahwaaaaa. Good one. I'm surprised your water is so clean w/o a skimmer. The first time we put a bong on our tank it went to work right away. Seems everybody's water is cleaner than mine. ![]() lot of my fish. I'm not a very technical type. That's why I rely on this group and my LFS. Jim |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 30, 1:40 pm, "jthread" wrote:
"Big Habeeb" wrote in message ... On Nov 30, 11:15 am, "jthread" wrote: George, Thanks for setting my mind at ease. The water certainly tests as clean, and for a 72 gallon tank my bioload is very small right now...8 snails, 6 hermits, ocellaris clown (sp), golden headed sleeper goby, PJ cardinal, and a cleaner shrimp...so yeah, to respond to another poster, there isn't much 'poop' in the tank. I've also done my best not to overfeed, putting in only a tiny pinch of food twice a day. Seems that just about everyhting I put in gets snapped up between the clown, card, and shrimp. Going this weekend to the LFS to add some more snails to help a bit more with the algae situation, and potentially adding a hippo tang as well (if they have any smaller ones...I know they get quite large, but I'd like to start off with it a bit smaller...and according to the LFS, its rare to find juvenile hippos this time of year). Mitch Are you poo pooing my "poop"? :-) Was that the first skimmer you had on your tank? Jim- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Jim, Not at all, I enjoyed the 'poop' reference. Yes, this is my first skimmer...I've never needed one because I've never done a reef tank prior to this one, so the technology is a bit new to me...to the point hwere when my LFS pulled one out, I was trying to figure out why he was selling me a bong to go with my tank. Mitch Bahwaaaaa. Good one. I'm surprised your water is so clean w/o a skimmer. The first time we put a bong on our tank it went to work right away. Seems everybody's water is cleaner than mine. ![]() lot of my fish. I'm not a very technical type. That's why I rely on this group and my LFS. Jim- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Jim, From my understanding of it (and mind you I'm new to this part of things too), the protein skimmers primary use is to remove organic crap, before it breaks down fully and pollutes the water. The reason I've never had one is, that in a fish only system I typically notice if something is laying dead at the bottom of the tank, and get it ouf ot there before decomposition becomes an issue. In a system with liverock, on the other hand, as I'm sure you know theres a TON of crap living in the rock...worms, stars, little snails, copepods etc which live and die on a daily basis...so as a result you can end up with a lot more organic 'crud' in the water...which is what the skimmer is for. I've heard of it being used in salt water fish only environments as well, and it probably reduces the frequency of water changes, but it's not as much a necessity as a live rock system. Now mind you, most of what I'm typing here is just stuff I'm regurgitating from reading, so don't take my word for it, but that's my understanding of the whole shpiel. Mitch |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've heard of it being used in salt water fish only environments
as well, and it probably reduces the frequency of water changes, but it's not as much a necessity as a live rock system. Mitch the skimmers help reduce water changes either way, so they are always good in either type system(FO, FOWLR, or Reef), just more critical in live reefs. you can always change the water in reefs more often and test more often instead of skimming, but its just better to skim the water and see if you can make it 2 months(+/-) without a water change by testing nitrates/phosphates carefully. The skimmer more than pays for lost salt due to more changes. If you go this long between H20 changes and do skim, you could use something like KENT "Essential Elements" or something of the like, to replace the elements that are skimmed along with the skim-ate, or poop, lol, like the poop reference. skimpoop, hehe. the Essential Elements contains Calcium, Iron, Iodine, Magensium, Manganese, Molybdenum, and Potassium, but a word to the wise, if you have any hair algae i would take care that first before dosing any kind of iron. We skim the 60 gal over here, but not the 29gal pod, its too easy to do water changes on the 29gal and too much room for an external skimmer since its on a table top instead of a tank stand and theres no sump in use. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "wolfdogg" wrote in message ... I've heard of it being used in salt water fish only environments as well, and it probably reduces the frequency of water changes, but it's not as much a necessity as a live rock system. Mitch the skimmers help reduce water changes either way, so they are always good in either type system(FO, FOWLR, or Reef), just more critical in live reefs. you can always change the water in reefs more often and test more often instead of skimming, but its just better to skim the water and see if you can make it 2 months(+/-) without a water change by testing nitrates/phosphates carefully. The skimmer more than pays for lost salt due to more changes. If you go this long between H20 changes and do skim, you could use something like KENT "Essential Elements" or something of the like, to replace the elements that are skimmed along with the skim-ate, or poop, lol, like the poop reference. skimpoop, hehe. the Essential Elements contains Calcium, Iron, Iodine, Magensium, Manganese, Molybdenum, and Potassium, but a word to the wise, if you have any hair algae i would take care that first before dosing any kind of iron. We skim the 60 gal over here, but not the 29gal pod, its too easy to do water changes on the 29gal and too much room for an external skimmer since its on a table top instead of a tank stand and theres no sump in use. Better have a good sump system. I tried running, with only a canister filter in, my 45 gal. and you have to be rich to keep up with the water changes. 10 gals every other day. OTOH: You probably have the same pod I have. The Oceanic Bio Cube and the Nano cube (sort of) has a skimmer built in. We have a shaphire skimmer too but I think it would do just as well filled with LR. I'm probably doing once a week 5 gal changes now. Better~but I'm getting rid of a lot of fish. "Poop" is the official name now. Sorry I had to dumb it down but you guys do too much reading :-) Jim |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Protein Skimmer | Peter Pan | Reefs | 2 | April 10th 07 12:36 PM |
Protein Skimmer | Bill | Reefs | 3 | September 9th 04 02:39 AM |
FS: Saltwater Equipment (skimmer, overflow, waste collector) (pics) | JohnL | Marketplace | 0 | August 21st 04 04:19 PM |
protein skimmer ? | Vicki | Reefs | 4 | April 1st 04 12:04 AM |
protein skimmer | President89 | Cichlids | 9 | March 21st 04 12:33 AM |