![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 3, 7:00�pm, "Big Habeeb (a.k.a. Mitch)"
wrote: On Mar 3, 5:30�pm, Wayne Sallee wrote: I have experimented with a bare bottom, and have found it to be interesting, but not as good in the long run. I have found that while having a refugium with deep sand bead is beneficial, the remote deep sand bead is not able to do the same as a deep sand bead located in the main aquarium where the action is at. Wayne Sallee Mark Cooper wrote on 3/1/2008 12:25 PM: KurtG wrote in : Any good recommendations for Detritus build-up? �I inherited a 100 gallon tank with a DSB, but I've been battling high nutrient loads since I got it. �I suspect that the DSB is loaded with detritus. --Kurt I have gone without a dsb and have had much better results. They are fine if you have the right maintenance, but without the right setup it's a detritus sink. I read a thread on Reef Frontiers where Anthony Calfo discussed that the successful dsb tanks have great flow, a great skimmer, and a balance of bioload, cleanup crew and dsb fauna. He stated that for most hobbyists it will save a lot of headaches if you go ssb or bb. He recommends the remote dsb as a trouble free option while reaping the benefits of a dsb.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - duh no wonder �here we have one dumbass running a sand "bead" �where others are usuing a sand "bed"..see what did I tell you about this group being full of dumbasses! �I bet this dumbass has his anal beads mixed up with his sand be, so I sure hope he does not try and cram a sand bed up his poop chute.but then againb it may be the norm for this clown. LOL!!!!!!!! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 3, 8:08Â*pm, bobandcarole wrote:
On Mar 3, 7:00�pm, "Big Habeeb (a.k.a. Mitch)" wrote: On Mar 3, 5:30�pm, Wayne Sallee wrote: I have experimented with a bare bottom, and have found it to be interesting, but not as good in the long run. I have found that while having a refugium with deep sand bead is beneficial, the remote deep sand bead is not able to do the same as a deep sand bead located in the main aquarium where the action is at. Wayne Sallee Mark Cooper wrote on 3/1/2008 12:25 PM: KurtG wrote in : Any good recommendations for Detritus build-up? �I inherited a 100 gallon tank with a DSB, but I've been battling high nutrient loads since I got it. �I suspect that the DSB is loaded with detritus. --Kurt I have gone without a dsb and have had much better results. They are fine if you have the right maintenance, but without the right setup it's a detritus sink. I read a thread on Reef Frontiers where Anthony Calfo discussed that the successful dsb tanks have great flow, a great skimmer, and a balance of bioload, cleanup crew and dsb fauna. He stated that for most hobbyists it will save a lot of headaches if you go ssb or bb. He recommends the remote dsb as a trouble free option while reaping the benefits of a dsb.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - duh no wonder �here we have one dumbass running a sand "bead" �where others are usuing a sand "bed"..see what did I tell you about this group being full of dumbasses! �I bet this dumbass has his anal beads mixed up with his sand be, so I sure hope he does not try and cram a sand bed up his poop chute.but then againb it may be the norm for this clown. LOL!!!!!!!!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - How many times do I have to keep correcting the ****ing subject? ****ing children need to leave their wanking hands off the subject. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|