![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all
I have a 150 gal. I set it up 15 years ago. Recently the bottom seal sprung a leak and I had to take it all down for repair. While it is down I decided to upgrade all the little things I wished I had done in the first place. One thing that was mentioned to me a few years ago by another reef tank owner, and I am thinking about doing, is to make the return water from my wet/dry filter spray out under the reef. I thought about doing this by placing an under-gravel filter grate down under the coral sand and live rock. I would put my spray bar that used to be over the top of the tank under the grate and it would pressurize the space under the reef and the gravel. The intended purpose would be to keep detritus and guk from building up under the reef where it is very difficult to get to during regular cleaning. Every time I have taken down my tank for rearrangement or repair it is incredible how much build up there is even after frequent gravel vacuuming and the reef has only been about 4 years old at the oldest any time I had occasion to tear it down or rearrange it. The concerns I have about this is possibly creating a situation that would expose the live rock and its inhabitants to too much oxygen, or some other consequence that I am unaware of. I have considered the loss of anaerobic activity in the live rock but I think that is mostly in the cavities in the rock its self and not so much under the gravel. I am also adding a coil denitrator to the filter system and even if I lost some anaerobic activity in the rock the reduction of decaying proteins and detritus under the reef and gravel would seem to be a fair trade off. The other possibility is the reduction of aeration of the water by loosing the "spray" on the top, but all the turbulence in a trickle system cycling 500 gallons per hour, and using a down-draft protein skimmer at about 250 gph. I think there is plenty of contact between air and water. The over head spray bar is probably redundant in that capacity anyway. What do you think? It sounds good but you know how that goes, years have taught me to be cautious. Has any one tried this, or heard of any one trying this? Got any other concerns than the oxygen? I welcome any comments Thanks Greg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Filter upgrade | chas good | Tech | 0 | June 25th 04 06:36 AM |
FS: 40 Gallon Nano Reef turn key system....... D/FW | Dave C | Marketplace | 0 | January 8th 04 01:47 AM |
Looking for small multi purpose filter ... | Harry Muscle | Tech | 4 | December 22nd 03 12:28 AM |
FS: Fluval 104 Canister Filter (in DFW) | Sandy | Marketplace | 0 | July 29th 03 02:42 PM |
FS: Fluval 204 Canister Filter (in DFW) | Sandy | Marketplace | 0 | July 29th 03 02:41 PM |