![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Would 384W of Power Compact lighting (4 X 96W) be enough for nearly "4wpg"
in a 77 gallon tank? (48"x24"x16"). We have about 2 feet of height that this light has to penetrate strongly. I'm pricing out some retrofit kits that go from 220watts (4X55) to 440watts (8X55W). I realize that PC lighting is much more efficient than the more conventional T8 or T12...but I don't know how it rates in the watts-per-gallon scale. I was thinking of metal halide but don't like the costs or heat factors. Thanx for any tips and ideas!! ![]() Dave. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll give you some of the same info I gave another guy below.
You must take into account the efficiency of the flourescent technology. T12, T10, T8, T5 are all increasing in efficiency. T12 is the old stuff with lowest efficiency. The watt/gal ratings were developed a long time ago during that period. A PowerCompact is T5 and worlds apart from an old T12 bulb watt for watt. Wattage alone does not determine how much light is produced. You must define the effciency. You need to consider lumens per gallon not wattage per gallon. I have a 100G tank and use 2 - 55W 24" 6700K PowerCompacts. That's 1W/G of T5 technology. More than enough light. I have O2 bubbles coming off my plants. Would not want more light, unless I was trying to raise plants for sale needing ultra fast growth. T5 PowerCompacts are nearly as efficient as Metal Halide. MH may appear much brighter, but that is due to the concentrated point source nature of the light. The total light output is not much different watt for watt. MH produces the shimmer effect because it is a point source, and therefore casts strong shadows. Flourescent does not because the light is spread out over a long blub thus eliminating shadows. Flourescent is diffuse lighting which is much better for a freshwater tank. It is important to realize that you must balance light, nutrient, and CO2 levels. Having too much light means your plants will need tons of nutrients and CO2. Continuous feeding at very high levels forever. It is not necessary nor desirable to light a freshwater tank like a reef tank. There are no trees out in the ocean, but there are lots of trees over streams. Most natural streams are largely covered in shade and most freshwater fish care little for bright light. Chris. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Clam in blastomussa, now what lighting? | Brad | Reefs | 3 | January 19th 04 02:09 AM |
Lighting question | John Q Public | Plants | 2 | December 6th 03 01:50 AM |
Lighting question | Carmine J. Ventura JR | Plants | 1 | December 5th 03 01:44 AM |
lighting ? | ~Vicki ~ | Reefs | 11 | August 16th 03 01:18 AM |
Yet another lighting question... | Danae | Plants | 1 | August 12th 03 11:46 AM |