![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lee and Jan,
Lee, if you will re-read my message I said I would go to KOIvet and raise hell. I didn't say anything about you. You just reported the information. I was not blaming you. I will have to find the article again. I was just thinking about KHV last week and wondering if it was still around. The article was run when the outbreaks first occurred. It was found that Goldfish were not affected at all and the virus did not host in the Goldfish. The researchers even injected the virus into the Goldfish and nothing happened. I spoke to the researcher in Arkansas on the phone, who was working with another researcher in California who substantiated the Goldfish information. You must realize by the time I read the article with publishing timetables a lot of time had past. But the researcher in Arkansas had closed down for the Summer break and froze all his specimens to work on them latter in the Fall when school started again. When he came back in the fall he tried to revive them and all the specimens were dead. He thought he had done something wrong or something was done to the lab while he was away, so he contacted the researcher in California who froze some specimens and sent them to him via courier. Needless to say, all the specimens were dead, and this is when they found out that lower temperatures kill the virus. Now about the herpes viruses; Herpes viruses are not transmitted via the water and they do not stay alive outside of the host, they are transmitted from fish to fish. Carp pox, which is not really a pox, but a herpes virus is spread by fish rubbing against one another. You already have found out that research on KHV did show that the fish could have it for awhile before it raises it ugly head to kill the fish in a very short time. This is one of the main reasons you are now suppose to quarantine your fish for a month. Years ago it was only 2 weeks, but with KHV around it could take a month for the disease to show up in your new fish and once it is spread to your other fish, because you didn't quarantine them, they start dying in about 3 week intervals. I will try looking tomorrow. I am the only one at the Archive listing the locations of the books being brought out and I am about 10,000 behind. My co-worker just hired two students and they have been bringing out books almost every single day. I will give it a shot though and see what I can come up with. Bye for now, it is getting late. Tom L.L. ----------------------------------------------------- "~ jan JJsPond.us" wrote in message ... I'm in agreement with you Lee, the virus surely must live outside the host, otherwise how is it transmitted between them? Supposedly we had one backyard dealer do her personal pond in by using the same net from Q-tank to established pond without sterilizing it. Regarding koivet and goldfish, it has been reported to the KHA's that this was a misprint. Perhaps Tom can enlighten us, because my understanding is at lower temps the virus goes dormant in the fish. Why it is suggested to allow the Q-tank to get up in the 70s a couple of weeks w/canary koi, before pronouncing the all clear? ~ jan On 18 Sep 2003 11:13:06 -0500, "Lee Brouillet" wrote: I wasn't blaming goldies, for Pete's sake! And I did say that it was an accepted theory that without a host, the virus dies off in a few days. To my knowledge, the virus affects only koi - that's why it's called Koi Herpes Virus (actually, the Israelis now want the name changed, as they don't think it's a herpes virus any more, but that's a different subject). Goldies are not affected by it, and to the best of my knowledge - are not carriers of it. In fact, that's one of the best ways to narrow down the diagnosis field: the koi die, the goldies don't. For argument's sake, however: something just horribly killed all the koi in your pond, but left other fish surviving. Would you jump to add more koi, or would you hedge your bets that just MAYBE the other fish - while unaffected - may/could be carriers? Would you just figure on waiting 72 hours before repopulating your pond, because after all, the virus is DEAD now - or perhaps you would add a few "canaries" to find out if they thrived or died before you added valued stock? Remember now that entire commercial facilities have been depopulated (a euphimism if I ever heard one) and scrubbed with chlorine several times before reintroducing stock (overkill perhaps, but what is being done nonetheless). Would it really be paranoia to at least *suspect* that maybe some of the virus could be hiding in your plants, rockwork, or whatevers? If the possibility didn't exist, why don't the commerical facilities just wait a week or so? I (obviously) have not read EVERY word on the subject, but I try to read as much as I can. I have not read anything that *definitively* excludes the *possibility* of carrier status benign to the goldies as most of the studies have been directed at the affected fish: koi (and most of my reading is directed at koi as I don't have any goldies). If you have read such a study - and I say this without ANY rancor - I would like to read it so I can eliminate future cautionary statements from any recommendations I may make. When I make errors, I prefer caution to recklessness. I am a hobbyist, not an aquaculturist. And I am always learning. Lee "Tom La Bron" wrote in message ... Folks, Where is the research that says the Goldfish carry the virus. All research that I have read said that it does not affect the goldfish in any way and that they do not carry the disease. Sounds like someone is looking for an escape goat. Nothing like blaming it on the goldfish. The research that I read and the researcher I talked about said that the herpes virus will not live outside the host. Also muffin, if you are worried about the pond put off getting your new fish until next spring, because even inside the fish the KHV will not live in cold water. It dies when the temps go below 50. I guess I will have to go to KOIVet and raise hell. Nothing like blaming crap on the goldfish. Tom L.L. ========================== "Lee Brouillet" wrote in message ... The stores/breeders *do* disinfect with chlorine - *EVERYthing* that comes in contact with the infected fish, including nets. Plants are suspect. Goldies and other pond fish are suspect, and you can't disinfect because of them. Two alternatives come to mind: a) build another pond, koi only; or b) skip koi and do goldies only. The goldies are nicer for a watergarden (they don't tear up plants like koi do!). This disease is one of the primary reasons why the new mantra is "quarantine - quarantine - quarantine". Good luck, Muffin. Lee "*muffin*" wrote in message ... the dealer, in Florida, had his stock checked at some university.. it was confirmed.( he got a bad shipment) (I'm in Ohio) I have been also told you need to disinfect everything with chlorine,, which is something I cannot do at this time. I am soooo confused. thought of losing another $200 worth of fish does please me. I can segregate a few fish, but even that will not stop them dying when I FINALLY do put them in the pond, so that doesn't seem like that is worthwhile to do. guess DO it, & see what comes,,, then decide if keeping the goldfish is worth it, of chuck every thing & start over.. "Lee Brouillet" wrote in message ... Muffin, whether or not goldfish can be carriers is an "unknown" at this time. It's an accepted theory that without a host, the virus dies off in the pond after several days. But you still had goldfish, so it's "iffy". It's also unproven as to whether or not the "heat cured" fish remain carriers. It's kinda like when you got chickenpox as a kid: you got over it - but you are 70% more likely to develop shingles as an adult (same stuff/different place), and the older you get (70's, 80's, etc.), the likelihood increases. Your new fish may be OK, or they may get sick from the goldies if the goldies are "shedding" the virus without getting sick themselves (think Typhoid Mary). In your position, I'd watch my "sacrificial" koi very carefully and keep the "good" koi in isolation, away from any potential problem until I was reasonably sure that that all was well in the pond. Was KHV an official diagnosis? Where are you located? Lee "*muffin*" wrote in message ... well, I lost several new purchased koi & the ones IN my pond to KHV 6 weeks ago. the shipper is replacing the fish,,(thankfully) but it is a PIA.. luckily I did NOT have a large assortment of ones in my pond already. (ok do NOT yell at me,, for not quarantine...... new pond,, fish IN the pond were mostly 10 cent goldfish)(all my goldfish were unaffected) anyway..... 3 weeks ago I put in 2 'store' koi.. they seem to be doing happily. but I read on koivet,, that goldfish can carry KHV........ so am I 'screwed'???? can I expect them to kick off? anyone else have any problems?luck (at least I read heat can 'probably' save them) See my ponds and filter design: http://users.owt.com/jjspond/ ~Keep 'em Wet!~ Tri-Cities WA Zone 7a To e-mail see website |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
GF as carriers cannot be ruled out. Many bacteria and viruses make some species sick
and/or kill them without affecting other species at all. Until the scientists rule GF out as carriers it would be wise to not repopulate with koi in the pond until a new "canary" koi has been in the pond a full season without showing signs of disease. Ingrid ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ List Manager: Puregold Goldfish List http://puregold.aquaria.net/ www.drsolo.com Solve the problem, dont waste energy finding who's to blame ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Unfortunately, I receive no money, gifts, discounts or other compensation for all the damn work I do, nor for any of the endorsements or recommendations I make. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|