A Fishkeeping forum. FishKeepingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishKeepingBanter.com forum » ponds » General
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Waterfall Pump



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 23rd 04, 07:06 PM
Francis
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Waterfall Pump

I would like to get a new waterfall pump (PowerJet WG 10,000... 137 watts @
2900 GPH). It seems to be a pretty energy efficient pump for the flow. It
has an 1 1/4" discharge. My question is that should I use an 1 1/4" pipe
from the discharge or actually use a 2" pipe, as maybe this would be more
efficient for the pump.

- Francis


  #2  
Old May 23rd 04, 10:33 PM
The~Doofie~Man©
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Waterfall Pump

Is the 2" the size coming off the pump?
I would use the size from the pump, then reduce in size if you feel its too
much.
You can't go 1 1/4" to 2" it won't work properly.

--
The~Doofie~Man ©
"LET ME SEE YOUR CIGARETTE LIGHTERS!!!!!"
Putting the fun back in FUNeral!!
http://www.geocities.com/doof70/index.html

"Francis" wrote in message
. rogers.com...
I would like to get a new waterfall pump (PowerJet WG 10,000... 137 watts

@
2900 GPH). It seems to be a pretty energy efficient pump for the flow.

It
has an 1 1/4" discharge. My question is that should I use an 1 1/4" pipe
from the discharge or actually use a 2" pipe, as maybe this would be more
efficient for the pump.

- Francis




  #3  
Old May 24th 04, 12:41 AM
John Rutz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Waterfall Pump



The~Doofie~Man© wrote:
Is the 2" the size coming off the pump?
I would use the size from the pump, then reduce in size if you feel its too
much.
You can't go 1 1/4" to 2" it won't work properly.


my pumps discharge is 1in
manufacture recomends 1 1/2 in piping for max flow, as mine are on long
pipe runs I go 2 inch from pump to oulet in filters or fall
going larger has no affect on the pump but going smaller can cause pumps
to fail earlier than theuy should

John Rutz

  #4  
Old May 23rd 04, 11:52 PM
Jim and Phyllis Hurley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Waterfall Pump

If you use 2" piping to the falls, your resistance will be less and your
pump will be more effective, despite the 1 1/4 exit.

Jim

--
____________________________________________
See our pond at: home.bellsouth.net\p\pwp-jameshurley
Ask me about Jog-A-Thon fundraiser (clears $120+ per child) at: jogathon.net

"Francis" wrote in message
. rogers.com...
I would like to get a new waterfall pump (PowerJet WG 10,000... 137 watts

@
2900 GPH). It seems to be a pretty energy efficient pump for the flow.

It
has an 1 1/4" discharge. My question is that should I use an 1 1/4" pipe
from the discharge or actually use a 2" pipe, as maybe this would be more
efficient for the pump.

- Francis




  #5  
Old May 24th 04, 12:39 AM
Francis
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Waterfall Pump

That's exactly what I want. Pump to falls only. I will use another pump
for my filtering. Wouldn't the increased volume of water (in weight) in the
pipes negatively effect the flow on a 4 foot head?

- Francis

"Jim and Phyllis Hurley" wrote in message
. ..
If you use 2" piping to the falls, your resistance will be less and your
pump will be more effective, despite the 1 1/4 exit.

Jim

--
____________________________________________
See our pond at: home.bellsouth.net\p\pwp-jameshurley
Ask me about Jog-A-Thon fundraiser (clears $120+ per child) at:

jogathon.net

"Francis" wrote in message
. rogers.com...
I would like to get a new waterfall pump (PowerJet WG 10,000... 137

watts
@
2900 GPH). It seems to be a pretty energy efficient pump for the flow.

It
has an 1 1/4" discharge. My question is that should I use an 1 1/4"

pipe
from the discharge or actually use a 2" pipe, as maybe this would be

more
efficient for the pump.

- Francis






  #6  
Old May 24th 04, 02:29 AM
RichToyBox
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Waterfall Pump

No. The pressure from the weight of the water is the same psi regardless of
the size of the pipe. The reason for going larger is to reduce flow rate
within the pipe. Faster flow means more friction, and consequently lost
energy.
--
RichToyBox
http://www.geocities.com/richtoybox/pondintro.html
"Francis" wrote in message
t.cable.rogers.com...
That's exactly what I want. Pump to falls only. I will use another pump
for my filtering. Wouldn't the increased volume of water (in weight) in

the
pipes negatively effect the flow on a 4 foot head?

- Francis

"Jim and Phyllis Hurley" wrote in message
. ..
If you use 2" piping to the falls, your resistance will be less and your
pump will be more effective, despite the 1 1/4 exit.

Jim

--
____________________________________________
See our pond at: home.bellsouth.net\p\pwp-jameshurley
Ask me about Jog-A-Thon fundraiser (clears $120+ per child) at:

jogathon.net

"Francis" wrote in message
. rogers.com...
I would like to get a new waterfall pump (PowerJet WG 10,000... 137

watts
@
2900 GPH). It seems to be a pretty energy efficient pump for the

flow.
It
has an 1 1/4" discharge. My question is that should I use an 1 1/4"

pipe
from the discharge or actually use a 2" pipe, as maybe this would be

more
efficient for the pump.

- Francis








  #7  
Old May 25th 04, 07:12 PM
AlienZen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Waterfall Pump


"RichToyBox" wrote in message
news:eecsc.103911$xw3.6129253@attbi_s04...
No. The pressure from the weight of the water is the same psi regardless of
the size of the pipe.


Actually, you may want to recalculate that.
A 1-1/4" pipe 4 ft long will contain0.3 gallons = 2.50 pounds
A 2" diameter pipe 4 ft long will contain 0.7 gallons = 5.84 pounds
The OP does not say how long the run is, but did say it was a 4 ft rise. Using a
2 "pipe will more than double the back pressure on the pump.

Mike
Just learning about ponds, but quite familiar with pumps... ;-)



  #8  
Old May 25th 04, 10:06 PM
Andrew Burgess
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Waterfall Pump

"AlienZen" writes:

"RichToyBox" wrote in message
news:eecsc.103911$xw3.6129253@attbi_s04...
No. The pressure from the weight of the water is the same psi regardless of
the size of the pipe.


Actually, you may want to recalculate that.
A 1-1/4" pipe 4 ft long will contain0.3 gallons = 2.50 pounds
A 2" diameter pipe 4 ft long will contain 0.7 gallons = 5.84 pounds
The OP does not say how long the run is, but did say it was a 4 ft rise. Using a
2 "pipe will more than double the back pressure on the pump.


Pressure is pounds per square inch, not pounds. Try
dividing he weight by the area.

For example, the pressure at the bottom of a vertical 20
foot pipe full of water is the same regardless of pipe
diameter. It's one of those counter-intuitive things about
plumbing...



  #9  
Old May 26th 04, 02:27 AM
Mark Swinkels
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Waterfall Pump

You could be pumping into the bottom of a pool 4' deep containing several
tons of water and the pressure would still be exactly the same as at the end
of a 4' pipe. Pressure is in pounds per square foot.

-- Mark

"AlienZen" wrote in message
...

"RichToyBox" wrote in message
news:eecsc.103911$xw3.6129253@attbi_s04...
No. The pressure from the weight of the water is the same psi

regardless of
the size of the pipe.


Actually, you may want to recalculate that.
A 1-1/4" pipe 4 ft long will contain0.3 gallons = 2.50 pounds
A 2" diameter pipe 4 ft long will contain 0.7 gallons = 5.84 pounds
The OP does not say how long the run is, but did say it was a 4 ft rise.

Using a
2 "pipe will more than double the back pressure on the pump.

Mike
Just learning about ponds, but quite familiar with pumps... ;-)





  #10  
Old May 26th 04, 11:32 PM
RichToyBox
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Waterfall Pump

Water weighs 62.4 pounds per cubic foot, so one square foot by one foot high
weighs 62.4 pounds. That translates to just over 0.43 pounds
--
RichToyBox
http://www.geocities.com/richtoybox/pondintro.htmlper square inch. That is
the pressure regardless of the size of the pipe. Now to hold the pipe up,
you would need a support that would hold the whole 62.4 pounds, but to push
water in or let water out, the pressure is what a pump would be pushing
against.
"AlienZen" wrote in message
...

"RichToyBox" wrote in message
news:eecsc.103911$xw3.6129253@attbi_s04...
No. The pressure from the weight of the water is the same psi

regardless of
the size of the pipe.


Actually, you may want to recalculate that.
A 1-1/4" pipe 4 ft long will contain0.3 gallons = 2.50 pounds
A 2" diameter pipe 4 ft long will contain 0.7 gallons = 5.84 pounds
The OP does not say how long the run is, but did say it was a 4 ft rise.

Using a
2 "pipe will more than double the back pressure on the pump.

Mike
Just learning about ponds, but quite familiar with pumps... ;-)





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Have you ever measured real water pump output flow rate? Pszemol Reefs 26 January 19th 04 04:33 AM
Increase Waterfall Flow? How about Pondmaster Waterfall Pumps? Runner General 4 December 6th 03 02:45 AM
pump heat transfer; recommendations ? Kevin M. Smith Reefs 2 October 11th 03 11:43 PM
Help choosing a pump for my new pond.... Ben Raines General 8 July 25th 03 12:41 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishKeepingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.