![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a problem... in my huge wisom I have covered a side wall
of the fishtank with a mirror-foil. Just to cover the unpleasant view behind of the tank... and to get some more light reflected back. Today I let the fish in this new tank... A pair of maroon clowns and hepatus tang get crazy seeing their own reflection in the tank wall. Now my title question: will they realize this is just a mirror soon or they will continue to fight the other fish in the mirror? How smart are they ? It is difficult to take the foil off since it is in a tight space between the tank and room wall... First day I turned off the lights sooner and wonder what will the group advice be... Should I go trought the trouble of removing the foil or the fish will get used to this reflection soon ? If so, how soon will it be ? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fish are not intelligent at all, they don't need to be, they have instincts
instead of handling difficult decisions. I used to raise fighting chicken. They are territorial and will defend its domain to the death, literally. You see, they have no choice, they will respond to a stimuli in the same way over and over and over again. So, if they get a response "starter" the reaction will be the same. In the case of fish, well, they are a couple of steps down from birds in the evolutionary scale. They will be triggered by the reflection and will respond in the same way for ever regardless of self-injury. Remember, animals don't know death or that their wounds are not going to heal. I visited a friend with a similar issue with a fish but he liked the aggressive reaction of the fish. Well, I visited him two years later and the same fish was doing the same funny reaction after an illumination trigger. But don't worry, as soon as they acknowledge its new "neighbors" as harmless, they will go around and invest their energy in other things. Yes they will comeback again but will not stay there for long. In the other hand, if they associate the other fish with the pain they felt after the hit, lol, you better change backgrounds. iy "Pszemol" wrote in message ... I have a problem... in my huge wisom I have covered a side wall of the fishtank with a mirror-foil. Just to cover the unpleasant view behind of the tank... and to get some more light reflected back. Today I let the fish in this new tank... A pair of maroon clowns and hepatus tang get crazy seeing their own reflection in the tank wall. Now my title question: will they realize this is just a mirror soon or they will continue to fight the other fish in the mirror? How smart are they ? It is difficult to take the foil off since it is in a tight space between the tank and room wall... First day I turned off the lights sooner and wonder what will the group advice be... Should I go trought the trouble of removing the foil or the fish will get used to this reflection soon ? If so, how soon will it be ? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Inabón Yunes wrote on 7/23/2006 12:50 AM: Fish are not intelligent at all, they don't need to be, they have instincts instead of handling difficult decisions. Not true. Fish are able to learn who feeds them, and who doesn't. Able to learn what the fish food container looks like. Able to recognize the fridge when someone opens the door, and they will beg for food every time you open the fridge if they are used to getting frozen food. Able to learn to come to you when you call them. And able to learn many other things. I used to raise fighting chicken. They are territorial and will defend its domain to the death, literally. You see, they have no choice, they will respond to a stimuli in the same way over and over and over again. So, if they get a response "starter" the reaction will be the same. In the case of fish, well, they are a couple of steps down from birds in the evolutionary scale. They will be triggered by the reflection and will respond in the same way for ever regardless of self-injury. Remember, animals don't know death or that their wounds are not going to heal. Not true. Fish know when they are dying. I visited a friend with a similar issue with a fish but he liked the aggressive reaction of the fish. Well, I visited him two years later and the same fish was doing the same funny reaction after an illumination trigger. But don't worry, as soon as they acknowledge its new "neighbors" as harmless, they will go around and invest their energy in other things. Yes they will comeback again but will not stay there for long. In the other hand, if they associate the other fish with the pain they felt after the hit, lol, you better change backgrounds. iy Fish are a lot smarter than people give them credit for. Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne Sallee wrote:
Not true. Fish know when they are dying. I visited a friend with a similar issue with a fish but he liked the aggressive reaction of the fish. Well, I visited him two years later and the same fish was doing the same funny reaction after an illumination trigger. But don't worry, as soon as they acknowledge its new "neighbors" as harmless, they will go around and invest their energy in other things. Yes they will comeback again but will not stay there for long. In the other hand, if they associate the other fish with the pain they felt after the hit, lol, you better change backgrounds. iy Fish are a lot smarter than people give them credit for. I agree with everything WS says. Unfortunately there seems to be no profit to be made from subsidizing research on fish intelligence, so there is minimum evidence of their learning ability, aside from anecdotes. But there are plenty of those. My fish know me, of course, especially the Cichlids who hide from everyone else. Pond fish, sal****er, turtles, everyone knows I'm food. They also know, I swear, who the net is after and only that fish becomes truly evasive. Anyone who says the fish don't know when they're dying has never looked in their eyes and felt painfully called upon and helpless. Granted I do some reading into what I see, but my empathy is based on clear observation. rtk |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne, Wayne...
When I was teaching biology in a CC, I knew better than to argue with lost causes. Just to give you an example of your lost cause here is a simple question; When and where the fish told you all those things? Now, here is a more complicated question; Who told fish that they are going to die, God? Fish are animals not humans like many people would like to think, you for example. They act as a response, they are able to learn a response to a stimuli, that is not intelligence. As I type here and hit the X key, for example, the computer writes that letter in a way that I can interpret it. Better yet, if I combine the X with the CTRL key, it will perfom a different task. Actually, if you use Word for example, it even completes the words for you or correct your spelling if instructed... Do you think my laptop is smart or just responding to a stimuli? lets see! iy "Wayne Sallee" wrote in message ... Inabón Yunes wrote on 7/23/2006 12:50 AM: Fish are not intelligent at all, they don't need to be, they have instincts instead of handling difficult decisions. Not true. Fish are able to learn who feeds them, and who doesn't. Able to learn what the fish food container looks like. Able to recognize the fridge when someone opens the door, and they will beg for food every time you open the fridge if they are used to getting frozen food. Able to learn to come to you when you call them. And able to learn many other things. I used to raise fighting chicken. They are territorial and will defend its domain to the death, literally. You see, they have no choice, they will respond to a stimuli in the same way over and over and over again. So, if they get a response "starter" the reaction will be the same. In the case of fish, well, they are a couple of steps down from birds in the evolutionary scale. They will be triggered by the reflection and will respond in the same way for ever regardless of self-injury. Remember, animals don't know death or that their wounds are not going to heal. Not true. Fish know when they are dying. I visited a friend with a similar issue with a fish but he liked the aggressive reaction of the fish. Well, I visited him two years later and the same fish was doing the same funny reaction after an illumination trigger. But don't worry, as soon as they acknowledge its new "neighbors" as harmless, they will go around and invest their energy in other things. Yes they will comeback again but will not stay there for long. In the other hand, if they associate the other fish with the pain they felt after the hit, lol, you better change backgrounds. iy Fish are a lot smarter than people give them credit for. Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Inabón Yunes wrote on 7/23/2006 12:50 AM:
In the case of fish, well, they are a couple of steps down from birds in the evolutionary scale. Evolution is a great for people that don't want to acknowledge the reality of the Creator. My computer evolved from a toaster oven. I tried to make some toast the other day, but even though the slots are of different sizes, I could not get a slice of bread in there. Obviously, an inferior evolutionary process. I'm sure it will become extinct soon. Get a chain, and cut every other link. Throw out all of the cut links. Take all of the intact links and arrange them so that they look pretty. You will then have a good working model of the theory of evolution. Actually, evolution is easy to prove. Simply gather some old bones from a variety of animals (your choice), and some human bones, and put them together so that they look half human, and then give it a name like Suzie. Scientist have recently discovered a new class of creatures down deep in the sea. They have classified them in the zoowacko group. They have 2 heads and 3 eyes on each head :-) Zigg and Zagg, Martians from Venus (they were born on Mars, but now live on Venus), did a study of the evolutionary order on earth. They decided to first doccument the order of evolvement of machines, since it was what most interested them. It was quite interesting reading, and learning how the different machines evolved from each other, like cars, trucks, microwaves, television sets, laptops, PDA's, watches, cranes, excetera. If you do a search on the internet you might be able to find their report :-) They still have a few missing links to figure out. After they get that study completely finished, they are going to do their next study on animals and it's evolvement on the great planet Earth. After both of those studies are completed and proven, they are to decide "which came first, the animals, or the machines?" Zigg and Zagg have pritty-much decided that the machines came first since they are more basic in construction than the animals, but that has yet to be proven. Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne Sallee" wrote in message ...
Inabón Yunes wrote on 7/23/2006 12:50 AM: In the case of fish, well, they are a couple of steps down from birds in the evolutionary scale. Evolution is a great for people that don't want to acknowledge the reality of the Creator. Creationism is great or people that don't want to acknowledge the fact they are alone in the Universe and there is no God listening to their prayers :-) My computer evolved from a toaster oven. I tried to make some toast the other day, but even though the slots are of different sizes, I could not get a slice of bread in there. Obviously, an inferior evolutionary process. I'm sure it will become extinct soon. No, it is not evolved from the toaster oven, Wayne... That was quite a foolish example :-) Get a chain, and cut every other link. Throw out all of the cut links. Take all of the intact links and arrange them so that they look pretty. You will then have a good working model of the theory of evolution. Only people who do not know evolution enough could make such a comment. Actually, evolution is easy to prove. Simply gather some old bones from a variety of animals (your choice), and some human bones, and put them together so that they look half human, and then give it a name like Suzie. Evolution theory gets new proofs every day with all the work scientists are doing all over The World. The problem is that you will not learn about these discoveries in church! You need to read some real books to find out about them! For some people, it is way too difficult to read science books, so they settle for "easy answers" derived from "Holy Bible". They do not explain anything this way - they just replace missing knowledge with unable to be prooven fairy tales... LOL :-) Every interesting question has only one answer in Creationism: "God did it". This way you can explain everything, but you will remain KNOWING NOTHING AT ALL. Scientist have recently discovered a new class of creatures down deep in the sea. They have classified them in the zoowacko group. They have 2 heads and 3 eyes on each head :-) Oh, really ? I would like to read about them... Throw some details, please. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Pszemol wrote on 7/24/2006 11:25 AM: Scientist have recently discovered a new class of creatures down deep in the sea. They have classified them in the zoowacko group. They have 2 heads and 3 eyes on each head :-) Oh, really ? I would like to read about them... Throw some details, please. Notice the "zowacko" name :-) Obviously there are no creatures with 2 heads and 3 eyes on each head. :-) There are deformities some times, but they are not normal. One thing that I find interesting, is that people that believe in evolution think that there is less similarities between people and animals than people that believe in creation. Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne Sallee" wrote in message ...
One thing that I find interesting, is that people that believe in evolution think that there is less similarities between people and animals than people that believe in creation. What are you talking about ? Where have you noticed this? I find exactly opposite in my observations... Christians believe only humans have souls - animals are things you can kill and eat, people are "better" than animals. Only people go to heaven, right ? :-) The single thing Darvin said about similarities about people to other primates created the most of his enemies. People believing in God believe they are special and significantly different from "beasts". Scientists see much more similarities between humans and other living beings than creationists. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New to Goldfish...having troubles. | Adam Lion | Goldfish | 9 | April 26th 05 09:44 AM |
San Diego Tropical Fish Society, July 11th | SanDiegoFishes | General | 0 | July 7th 04 02:59 AM |
NYT Mag article about goldfish vets | Gunther | Goldfish | 1 | May 3rd 04 12:03 PM |
Watering the aquarium plants. | Cardman | Plants | 29 | April 11th 04 04:02 AM |
Alkalinity problems? | D&M | General | 5 | July 15th 03 12:48 AM |