Remo Groupies, was Aconitum - Facts

"Lilly" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:49:46 -0700,
(paghat) wrote:

Lilly, I feel there may be hope for you. Although Paggers thinks I was
mean-spirited because I emailed her asking that she not support *the
would-be author who shall not be named* -- I think that you, at least,
might recognize that NONE of this is relevant to either rec.gardens.roses or
rec.ponds.

Thank you,

the adults

Try using your delete key.
"Anne Lurie" wrote in message
m...
"Lilly" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:49:46 -0700,
(paghat) wrote:

Lilly, I feel there may be hope for you. Although Paggers thinks I
was
mean-spirited because I emailed her asking that she not support *the
would-be author who shall not be named* -- I think that you, at
least,
might recognize that NONE of this is relevant to either
rec.gardens.roses or
rec.ponds.

Thank you,

the adults

"Anne Lurie" wrote in message om...
"Lilly" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:49:46 -0700,
(paghat) wrote:

Lilly, I feel there may be hope for you. Although Paggers thinks I was
mean-spirited because I emailed her asking that she not support *the
would-be author who shall not be named* -- I think that you, at least,
might recognize that NONE of this is relevant to either rec.gardens.roses or
rec.ponds.

Thank you,

the adults

YOU among "the adults"? Get real. You're so crazy-ass that you ABUSED
usenet by your unwarranted & assinine attempt to convince usenet
posters to go to amazon.com & post bad reviews of someone's book.
Whether or not it was bad was beside the point. You saw an open forum,
you personally abused it, & like any skanky second-rate troll you
invited others to abuse the same review forum. It's the kind of
behavior that could very easily have gotten you successfully netcopped
if anyone thought you were worth the extra penny of their time to
treat you as your treat others. That you invited abuse of the amazon
review system as your personal revenge tactic -- against someone who
never actually did you any harm -- is behavior that makes you an
abusive asshole at best, a crazy net-stalker at worst.

Then in response to the poor sap's perfectly REASONABLE post on
aconites, which by the way are perfectly appropriate around ponds or
in the shade of large old roses, you e-mailed ME and told me what a
spammer the original poster is & for me to banish him & never reply to
him & so & so forth -- inducing me to tell you to "keep it on usenet"
& stay the hell out of my personal e-mail. Your off-net tactics to
drum up "support" for you irrational obsession extends what appears
indeed to be net-stalking off & on the web, whether the sap spams or
not. If you can't even wait for an ACTUAL spam upon which to start
harrassing & acting crazy, there is something SERIOUSLY wrong with you
babe.

So don't drag my name in your nastiness unless you seriously do want
an outsider's CLEAR evaluation. The original poster wrote of a flower
I love, a good & appropriate post. I responded with valuable
additions. And you right away restart your harrassment game BECAUSE
YOU'RE CRAZY.

If and when you learn to be a rational "adult" as you pretend, that's
the same day you'll master your killfile or merely use your delete key
when you take one of your irrational dislikes to someone, rather than
email strangers & try to drum up support for your stalking methods. As
it stands, anything the alleged spammer has ever done wrong in the
past is NOTHING compared to YOUR bad behavior right here & now, up to
& including starting your own crossposted flame threads on a topic you
pretend you wish was gone.

-paghat the ratgirl