![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello all,
I've always enjoyed the look of live plants in my tanks and I have just downsized to keeping only one tank. (school does that to you) So I've kept my 240 gal with the overflow down into a sump. I'm using a Mag 18 to pump the water back up from the sump into the display tank and figure I have about 1100 gph total coming in from the two inlets. My problem is that I think there's too much air/water mixing when the water runs down through the plumbing into the sump and it's compromising my CO2 levels. The 4 live plants I do have in the tank ("tropical amazon" and 3 crypts) are still alive, but I don't feel that they're growing as should be expected. Does anyone else have an overflow system to a sump that they use? How did you control the air/water mixing to prevent CO2 loss? Thank you, Justin |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here are two options.
Replace any bio-balls with blocks or course open cell foam. This will reduce the gas exchange. Change the chambers so they no longer have air spaces. In the skimmer place two pipes, one that fits in the outlet with the top an inch below the top of the skimmer. The second is a larger pipe that is the same height or a little higher, cut some slits at the bottom of the pipe to allow the water in. This forces the water down the skimmer then back up to the higher outlet. You can do something similar in the tickle portion of the sump although this generally requires modifications to block where the water is designed to go into the sump. Or just remove the tickle box and allow the water to go directly into the sump (probably what I would do). If the skimmer is full of water and the outlet is under water in the sump there should be no place for air to get into the plumbing and it will eventually fill with water. Four plants will not be enough to replace the biological filtration you will lose, so plan on adding many more plants. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for your input.
I'm not worried about the biofiltration. I have a fluidized bed filter running on bypass through the sump. Currently, I have drilled standpipes in the skimmer box, I tried the open pipe under the water level idea and got this huge sucking sound as the water is gravity fed down into the sump. I think the problem is that I can't get a closed siphon going in an open sump system. Not enough water coming down the pipe means air and water mixing and too much water being pumped up into the tank means overflow and wet carpet. Thanks, Justin "jet" wrote in message oups.com... Here are two options. Replace any bio-balls with blocks or course open cell foam. This will reduce the gas exchange. Change the chambers so they no longer have air spaces. In the skimmer place two pipes, one that fits in the outlet with the top an inch below the top of the skimmer. The second is a larger pipe that is the same height or a little higher, cut some slits at the bottom of the pipe to allow the water in. This forces the water down the skimmer then back up to the higher outlet. You can do something similar in the tickle portion of the sump although this generally requires modifications to block where the water is designed to go into the sump. Or just remove the tickle box and allow the water to go directly into the sump (probably what I would do). If the skimmer is full of water and the outlet is under water in the sump there should be no place for air to get into the plumbing and it will eventually fill with water. Four plants will not be enough to replace the biological filtration you will lose, so plan on adding many more plants. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Justin Boucher" wrote in message news:kz8pe.14829$U_2.9557@trnddc06... Thanks for your input. I'm not worried about the biofiltration. I have a fluidized bed filter running on bypass through the sump. Currently, I have drilled standpipes in the skimmer box, I tried the open pipe under the water level idea and got this huge sucking sound as the water is gravity fed down into the sump. I think the problem is that I can't get a closed siphon going in an open sump system. Not enough water coming down the pipe means air and water mixing and too much water being pumped up into the Why not use an aquatic ball valve inline and get the right balance of water being pumped back into the tank? tank means overflow and wet carpet. Thanks, Justin "jet" wrote in message oups.com... Here are two options. Replace any bio-balls with blocks or course open cell foam. This will reduce the gas exchange. Change the chambers so they no longer have air spaces. In the skimmer place two pipes, one that fits in the outlet with the top an inch below the top of the skimmer. The second is a larger pipe that is the same height or a little higher, cut some slits at the bottom of the pipe to allow the water in. This forces the water down the skimmer then back up to the higher outlet. You can do something similar in the tickle portion of the sump although this generally requires modifications to block where the water is designed to go into the sump. Or just remove the tickle box and allow the water to go directly into the sump (probably what I would do). If the skimmer is full of water and the outlet is under water in the sump there should be no place for air to get into the plumbing and it will eventually fill with water. Four plants will not be enough to replace the biological filtration you will lose, so plan on adding many more plants. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thinking about it I see why it would not work. 1100 gph is a lot to get
through stand pipes. I assume the tank is drilled with 3/4" ID bulkheads. Reducing the flow would help some but it is hard on the pump and if I recall the Mag doesn't handle high head pressure very well. It may be the best you can do it minimize the turbulence and air contant (no right angles, foam instead of bio-balls, stand pipe with 3/8" holes drilled up the side, etc.). This is the problem with sump systems. They were designed with marine systems in mind where maximizing the O2 is desired and they did not have to figure out how to move the water around without removing the CO2. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Excellent point. This is Marine to Freshwater converstion since the tank
was designed with a marine system in mind. I am using 1" ID rigid PVC with only 2 elbows. I already have the standpipes drilled and one of them is set-up as a backup stand pipe (to help prevent tank overflow) As for the Mag, references I got from the marine group support the Mag pumps. They do have a special mentioning for head pressure however (which I have figured in my calculations). It seems that I'm stuck with at least a little air turbulence since this system was originally designed for a Marine system. Thank you, Justin "jet" wrote in message oups.com... Thinking about it I see why it would not work. 1100 gph is a lot to get through stand pipes. I assume the tank is drilled with 3/4" ID bulkheads. Reducing the flow would help some but it is hard on the pump and if I recall the Mag doesn't handle high head pressure very well. It may be the best you can do it minimize the turbulence and air contant (no right angles, foam instead of bio-balls, stand pipe with 3/8" holes drilled up the side, etc.). This is the problem with sump systems. They were designed with marine systems in mind where maximizing the O2 is desired and they did not have to figure out how to move the water around without removing the CO2. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Justin Boucher" wrote in message news:IROpe.18049$_w.9805@trnddc01... Excellent point. This is Marine to Freshwater converstion since the tank was designed with a marine system in mind. I am using 1" ID rigid PVC with only 2 elbows. I already have the standpipes drilled and one of them is set-up as a backup stand pipe (to help prevent tank overflow) As for the Mag, references I got from the marine group support the Mag pumps. They do have a special mentioning for head pressure however (which I have figured in my calculations). Could you or anyone else recommend a better pump? According to my catalogs the danner mag pumps have the best head height per watt of energy used, the only pump offered in that pet place's catalog up to date that beats the most powerful mag pump is a seahorse pump by rainbow lifeguard and it is way more costly than the danner mag pumps, as far as head height and flow rate is concerned the danner mag pumps are the best unless you want to spend a ton more and get a seahorse rainbow-lifeguard self priming pump. Later! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rec.ponds FAQ | Snooze | General | 0 | May 17th 05 03:05 AM |
PH in new tank | smartbomb | Reefs | 50 | May 11th 05 08:38 PM |
HELP massive fish die-off | Bill K | General | 7 | July 23rd 04 01:40 PM |
Hard Water Tetras? | rapdor | General | 7 | September 14th 03 12:35 PM |
Alkalinity problems? | D&M | General | 5 | July 15th 03 12:48 AM |