A Fishkeeping forum. FishKeepingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishKeepingBanter.com forum » rec.aquaria » Tech
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Odd Filter Idea



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 24th 03, 08:33 PM
Ben
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Odd Filter Idea

Hi All,

I was wondering if anyone had ever hooked up an overhanging powerfilter
to an undergravel filter? I notice that after I have my tank set up for
a while, lots of mulm accumulates under the UGF's bed. (Again, this is
expected and wanted). So every other water change I do, I pull out one
of the extra cap, put the syphon over the hole and suck out as much of
the crap (no pun intended) as I can remove. This works well enough that
I don't mind doing it.

All that being said, I noticed that my Aquaclear 500 is almost exactly
above on of the UGF's tube opening which made me think. Would it be a
good idea to link them. The positives I see is that it would remove
much mulm from the bottom and since it's constant, it won't have time to
build up. The downsides I see are that I have to change the filters
more often this way.

Does anyone see any other negative or positives about this? And/or has
anyone done this before?

TIA
-Ben

  #2  
Old July 26th 03, 04:22 AM
richard reynolds
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Odd Filter Idea

its been done before search groups.gogole.com for RUGF (generally) there better than
UGF's, I dont recall but i think there a bad idea in planted tanks. either search or wait
for someone to jump in if I am wrong.

Ben wrote in message ...
Hi All,

I was wondering if anyone had ever hooked up an overhanging powerfilter
to an undergravel filter? I notice that after I have my tank set up for
a while, lots of mulm accumulates under the UGF's bed. (Again, this is
expected and wanted). So every other water change I do, I pull out one
of the extra cap, put the syphon over the hole and suck out as much of
the crap (no pun intended) as I can remove. This works well enough that
I don't mind doing it.

All that being said, I noticed that my Aquaclear 500 is almost exactly
above on of the UGF's tube opening which made me think. Would it be a
good idea to link them. The positives I see is that it would remove
much mulm from the bottom and since it's constant, it won't have time to
build up. The downsides I see are that I have to change the filters
more often this way.

Does anyone see any other negative or positives about this? And/or has
anyone done this before?

TIA
-Ben

--
richard reynolds




  #3  
Old July 30th 03, 10:20 AM
Loz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Odd Filter Idea

I have done this before and it worked great. Although it was a DIY
undergravel. I just siliconed a small length of flexible tubing to a Whisper
and the undergravel. I did this because I had a spare whisper and also to
increase the effectiveness of the UG. I got around the plant problem by only
having the UG plate about 2/3 the size of the tank, thus leaving a column
down either side and the back where I could plant. I also had a carpet of
java moss and java ferm attached to driftwood.
HTH Laurie

"Ben" wrote in message
...
Hi All,

I was wondering if anyone had ever hooked up an overhanging powerfilter
to an undergravel filter? I notice that after I have my tank set up for
a while, lots of mulm accumulates under the UGF's bed. (Again, this is
expected and wanted). So every other water change I do, I pull out one
of the extra cap, put the syphon over the hole and suck out as much of
the crap (no pun intended) as I can remove. This works well enough that
I don't mind doing it.

All that being said, I noticed that my Aquaclear 500 is almost exactly
above on of the UGF's tube opening which made me think. Would it be a
good idea to link them. The positives I see is that it would remove
much mulm from the bottom and since it's constant, it won't have time to
build up. The downsides I see are that I have to change the filters
more often this way.

Does anyone see any other negative or positives about this? And/or has
anyone done this before?

TIA
-Ben



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
juwel filter Stefano General 3 August 1st 04 04:55 PM
louder Whisper filter David Ditch General 2 November 27th 03 04:16 PM
Filter opinions? Dan Norgard General 7 September 3rd 03 10:44 PM
Filter Media Eddie General 12 September 2nd 03 09:50 PM
first filter change Dr Engelbert Buxbaum General 0 July 16th 03 12:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishKeepingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.