![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm just curious if anyone has successfully run a reef with a cannister
filter (Fluval) and undergravel? I ran a great fish only setup this way and have attempted a reef with the ecosystem. The ecosystem stabilized for about 6 months then it just went way out of whack. I suddenly had a die off of caulerpa which caused a hair outbreak. Never got rid of hair no matter how many water changes I did. I even replaced my MH bulbs and CF tubes. No help. Bottom line, not impressed so I'm thinking about going back to basics when I move next month. Thanks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Did you happen to do any level checks? UG filter systems tend to be
nitrate factories, which will cause the caulerpa die-off and feed the GHA. Basics (live sand, live rock, lots of water motion) is easier and significantly :-) more effective. Feel free to use the fluval, but get rid of the sponges, carbon, etc. etc. In other words, use it as a closed-loop pump and nothing else. Otherwise you'll have another nitrate factory on your hands. HTH :-) On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 16:50:58 +0000, Scott wrote: I'm just curious if anyone has successfully run a reef with a cannister filter (Fluval) and undergravel? I ran a great fish only setup this way and have attempted a reef with the ecosystem. The ecosystem stabilized for about 6 months then it just went way out of whack. I suddenly had a die off of caulerpa which caused a hair outbreak. Never got rid of hair no matter how many water changes I did. I even replaced my MH bulbs and CF tubes. No help. Bottom line, not impressed so I'm thinking about going back to basics when I move next month. Thanks. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Marco Qualizza" wrote in message news ![]() Did you happen to do any level checks? UG filter systems tend to be nitrate factories, which will cause the caulerpa die-off and feed the GHA. Basics (live sand, live rock, lots of water motion) is easier and significantly :-) more effective. Feel free to use the fluval, but get rid of the sponges, carbon, etc. etc. In other words, use it as a closed-loop pump and nothing else. Otherwise you'll have another nitrate factory on your hands. HTH :-) On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 16:50:58 +0000, Scott wrote: I'm just curious if anyone has successfully run a reef with a cannister filter (Fluval) and undergravel? I ran a great fish only setup this way and have attempted a reef with the ecosystem. The ecosystem stabilized for about 6 months then it just went way out of whack. I suddenly had a die off of caulerpa which caused a hair outbreak. Never got rid of hair no matter how many water changes I did. I even replaced my MH bulbs and CF tubes. No help. Bottom line, not impressed so I'm thinking about going back to basics when I move next month. Thanks. i tried to run an empty canister filter for extra water volume (10g nano) and water movement. My nitrates were considerably higher running the empty canister. Partly because its a storage tank for debris. Plus it was inhibiting my skimmer, hardly any foam at all. IMHO canisters are for freshwater of FO systems, with the exception of running carbon occasionally. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Newbie with filtration questions | Mark | General | 1 | March 7th 04 11:46 PM |
Changing Filtration in established tank. | Glenn Serpas | General | 5 | January 10th 04 03:04 AM |
Filtration question | Bruce Abrams | General | 1 | December 13th 03 02:40 AM |
Filtration question | Bruce Abrams | Tech | 1 | December 13th 03 02:40 AM |
I need a very simple answer to a lighting and filter question. | Ben | General | 8 | July 26th 03 07:12 AM |