![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 19 May, Sir Douglas Cook wrote:
"Chuck Gadd" wrote in message news ![]() Completely false at levels encountered in our aquariums. CO2 levels elevated to the levels used for planted aquaria (40ppm max) will not prevent any absorption of O2. Wrong, it make sense that 40ppm could be oxygen which is replaced with CO2. As stated above. But that's irrelevant to the point. It matters not one jot whether or not "40ppm could be oxygen" if the oxygen level is able to reach higher levels than the fish require whether or not there's 40ppm CO2. That is, suppose your fish want 100 units of oxygen. Suppose that without CO2, your water can hold 900 units oxygen. Suppose with CO2 the water can 'only' hold 897 units oxygen. Now, will the fish be unhappy because there are 3 units that "could be oxygen"? Besides which, you should test some tanks. When I've done so, the densely planted tanks with CO2 injection have had significantly higher oxygen than the largely unplanted tanks. I think you're assuming that all water is always fully saturated with gas, and that simply isn't true. regards, Ian SMith -- |\ /| no .sig |o o| |/ \| |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Free: San Diego Tropical Fish Society, June 13th | SanDiegoFishes | General | 0 | June 10th 04 03:50 AM |
San Diego Tropical Fish Society, Feb 8th, join us, it is free | SanDiegoFishes | General | 0 | February 8th 04 12:06 AM |
Earn $500 to $700 per Week Downloading FREE Software | Cash Cow | General | 0 | August 16th 03 03:34 AM |
EARN$£$600\week downloading free software | [email protected] | Tech | 0 | July 28th 03 03:32 AM |