![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() dfreas wrote: Right. Whatever. My first aquarium was a ten gallon tank from walmart that I stuck a lionhead goldfish, two black moors, and a pl*co in. I never had any problems and I checked the water quality practically daily. 3 goldfish does not make this tank overstocked. 6 months from now it may be overstocked but I'd be willing to bet that after six months he'll have either discovered he doesn't like this hobby and have gotten rid of his fish or decide he loves the hobby and buy another tank. It seems like practically everyone around here is always jumping on every new person that wanders in about how overstocked their new tank is. Overstocked is an extremely relative term. I have a 20 gallon aquarium with about 35 inches worth of fish in it plus clams, snails and shrimp - it always has less than 10ppm nitrates. Is it overstocked? No. The only way to tell if an aquarium is overstocked is to watch the fish and see if they are comfortable and have enough swimming room and then test the water to make sure it's healthy. If you can't do that (which no one here can) then you can't say if the tank is overstocked or not. The only time we should ever accuse someone of having an overstocked tank is when they come in here saying "I have 50 fish in my new ten gallon tank and they keep dying...whats wrong!?!?" -Daniel How about levels of hormones that are not tested - this can determine if a fish becomes stunted. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
While I am as yet unconvinced this is actually even a valid concern I
would point out that hormones almost certainly build up slower than nitrates if in fact they do build up. Therefore if your tank maintenance schedule is keeping nitrates down it is almost certainly also keeping hormones down. -Daniel |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I disagree with the "a 10g with more than i goldfish is not overstocked"
theory sorry... ....A puppy could "look" comfortable in a cage...but its not really comfortable...Nor is it HUMANE Come on...more than 1 goldfish IS way too much for a 10g....They produce soo much ammonia, its incredible... and may i add that if large frequent water changes are a way to keep the levels down, you are adding to the stress of the fish aswell as making life harder for yourself by doing the extra work... IT IS OVERSTOCKED....but wait...let me finish.....its isnt as bad as some peoples tanks... You can't tell if a fish is comfortable ....What do they do....pull out their recliners, put their pectoral fins behind their heads and sip on champagne?...Yeah right...you can find fish that looks fine and happy fine one minute, and the next minute they go belly up.... In overstocking cases, the fishs' outsides may stop growing....but what about the insides? They don't stop growing....this is where the trouble starts. The probability of fish getting diseases and sickness in an overstocked tank is higher than a safely stocked tank. Goldfish (such as comets, shubunkins, commons) can grow to at least 10 inches in a matter of 1 year....try fitting one of them in a 10G tank! Fancies also need more room as they aren't fast swimmers and need room for error correction. If a fish fears something, they put out a "fear scent" throught the tank....in an overstocked tank, this fear scent is concentrated causing them to dart all over the place and finally getting so stressed that it can cause them respiration problems. A big point for the at least 10G per gf rule....disease and polution prevention... Like us, gf like the space....could you live in a bus with 3 other people all day everyday,getting someone to give you food twice a day, having to go to the toilet there and not be able to get out?? Sounds uncomfortable doesnt it.......It is uncomfortable for us...so why out your pets through that.... Ive been keeping goldfish and koi in my pond for nearly 15 years, have several tanks setup up for about 5 years and have worked in Aquaculture for over 5 years....So please spare me and don't tell me that i don't know what im talking about...... "dfreas" wrote in message ups.com... While I am as yet unconvinced this is actually even a valid concern I would point out that hormones almost certainly build up slower than nitrates if in fact they do build up. Therefore if your tank maintenance schedule is keeping nitrates down it is almost certainly also keeping hormones down. -Daniel |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok, you disagree - I still think you're wrong. It is easy to tell if a
fish is happy - watch its behavior. Unhappy fish do not exhibit natural behavior patterns. If you have ever had a "fish that looks fine and happy fine...go belly up" then you don't pay enough attention to your fish. I almost always keep my tanks far above the normally accepted stocking limits yet I am quite sure they are very happy. Why? Because I watch them breed, I see their colors get brighter as they stay in my tank longer, I watch them school and interact the way healthy fish do and I watch them grow quite quickly. I get top dollar from my LFS for any fish I wish to sell him because my fish look better than the fish from any other source he has. That doesn't happen unless the fish are "fine and happy fine" Most of what you say sounds like something from a petsmart FAQ. Despite the dogmatic warnings we have all heard about overstocked tanks the facts are the warnings are simply not true. They are good guidelines for beginners who may not want to put a lot of time into their tanks but they don't hold water if you actually test them. I would be glad to share any information you would like to have about my "overstocked" aquariums. I assure you they are running far above their recommended capacity of fish and are completely "happy fine." -Daniel |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() anemone wrote: Come on...more than 1 goldfish IS way too much for a 10g....They produce soo much ammonia, its incredible... and may i add that if large frequent water changes are a way to keep the levels down, you are adding to the stress of the fish aswell as making life harder for yourself by doing the extra work... I know you mean well, but when is there a point in time where a goldfish in a glass tank has enough volume/space? Wouldn't 20gallons/goldfish be better than 10g/goldfish? 50g/goldfish? 100g/goldfish? Could it be possible that the water in a particular 10g (or smaller) tank is better for a goldfish than the water in some other 40g tank? Or have we come to the conclusion that the water in a 10g tank is ALWAYS worse (i.e. more toxic) than the water in any 40g tank, for more than 1 goldfish? And have we come to a conclusion that providing more than 10g per goldfish WILL guarantee a healthy fish? I have 3 goldfish in a 10g tank, and my wife won't let me buy a bigger tank right now. The 3rd goldfish she insisted on adding (during tank cycling days with already 2 goldfish in the tank!) had what looked like ammonia burns when we got it from the chain fish store (we didn't know anything about ammonia burns then, and thought it was nice fin-coloring!), but it actually recovered in my 10g tank! Ammonia Alert(tm) indicated grey during cycling, and is currently yellow (safe). I did 1g/day water changes. Now I do 2gallons every 2 or 3 days. So where is all that Ammonia that the 3 goldfish (in my 10g tank) is excreting? When the fish get bigger, I foresee getting a bigger tank. In retrospect, I should have bought the larger tank at the beginning, but I (and I am NOT a fish expert) feel that unless fish have no space to swim properly (a relative term), the quality of the water in the tank is the most important consideration. Yes, one has to work a little more often to ensure that the water in a 10g tank is acceptable for 3 goldfish. My wife had raised 6 goldfish for 8 years in what looked like a 40 gallon tank. She did not use tap water de-chlorinators. she did not know that the power filter had a cartridge that could be changed. But she did 80% (or more) water changes almost weekly, and I believe that is what kept the fish alive for 8 years. I'm not sure if I would have done the same thing, but that system worked for 8 (possibly more) years. (One of her tenants accidentally washed the tank with detergent in her absence, and that killed all 6 goldfish) You can't tell if a fish is comfortable If one can't tell if goldfish are uncomfortable by watching them, how does one tell that they are comfortable in any given tank? To me, a change in their normal behavior/breathing/swimming pattern would indicate a possible problem. If the 6 goldfish survived 8 years in a 40 gallon glass tank, my wife was definitely doing something right. Sure, they may have been happier in a tank twice that size. And they may have been even happier not being in any glasss tank at all. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The also would have had the potential to live twice as long. 8 years isn't
that much for a goldfish dude. "Gfishery" wrote in message oups.com... anemone wrote: Come on...more than 1 goldfish IS way too much for a 10g....They produce soo much ammonia, its incredible... and may i add that if large frequent water changes are a way to keep the levels down, you are adding to the stress of the fish aswell as making life harder for yourself by doing the extra work... I know you mean well, but when is there a point in time where a goldfish in a glass tank has enough volume/space? Wouldn't 20gallons/goldfish be better than 10g/goldfish? 50g/goldfish? 100g/goldfish? Could it be possible that the water in a particular 10g (or smaller) tank is better for a goldfish than the water in some other 40g tank? Or have we come to the conclusion that the water in a 10g tank is ALWAYS worse (i.e. more toxic) than the water in any 40g tank, for more than 1 goldfish? And have we come to a conclusion that providing more than 10g per goldfish WILL guarantee a healthy fish? I have 3 goldfish in a 10g tank, and my wife won't let me buy a bigger tank right now. The 3rd goldfish she insisted on adding (during tank cycling days with already 2 goldfish in the tank!) had what looked like ammonia burns when we got it from the chain fish store (we didn't know anything about ammonia burns then, and thought it was nice fin-coloring!), but it actually recovered in my 10g tank! Ammonia Alert(tm) indicated grey during cycling, and is currently yellow (safe). I did 1g/day water changes. Now I do 2gallons every 2 or 3 days. So where is all that Ammonia that the 3 goldfish (in my 10g tank) is excreting? When the fish get bigger, I foresee getting a bigger tank. In retrospect, I should have bought the larger tank at the beginning, but I (and I am NOT a fish expert) feel that unless fish have no space to swim properly (a relative term), the quality of the water in the tank is the most important consideration. Yes, one has to work a little more often to ensure that the water in a 10g tank is acceptable for 3 goldfish. My wife had raised 6 goldfish for 8 years in what looked like a 40 gallon tank. She did not use tap water de-chlorinators. she did not know that the power filter had a cartridge that could be changed. But she did 80% (or more) water changes almost weekly, and I believe that is what kept the fish alive for 8 years. I'm not sure if I would have done the same thing, but that system worked for 8 (possibly more) years. (One of her tenants accidentally washed the tank with detergent in her absence, and that killed all 6 goldfish) You can't tell if a fish is comfortable If one can't tell if goldfish are uncomfortable by watching them, how does one tell that they are comfortable in any given tank? To me, a change in their normal behavior/breathing/swimming pattern would indicate a possible problem. If the 6 goldfish survived 8 years in a 40 gallon glass tank, my wife was definitely doing something right. Sure, they may have been happier in a tank twice that size. And they may have been even happier not being in any glasss tank at all. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() blue sky wrote: The also would have had the potential to live twice as long. 8 years isn't that much for a goldfish dude. They did not die "normally" after 8 years. Someone washed the tank with detergent in her absence, and that killed all 6 goldfish the next day. Has anyone here had the same goldfish for 15 years? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gfishery" wrote in message oups.com... blue sky wrote: The also would have had the potential to live twice as long. 8 years isn't that much for a goldfish dude. They did not die "normally" after 8 years. Someone washed the tank with detergent in her absence, and that killed all 6 goldfish the next day. Has anyone here had the same goldfish for 15 years? Not yet, but I expect to. And he's my first, too. A |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Filtration and nitrates question | Mark Cooper | Reefs | 8 | February 17th 05 02:26 AM |
question on algae and UGF filtration | Eric Gutierrez | General | 8 | July 30th 04 01:53 PM |
Filtration question | Scott | Reefs | 2 | April 13th 04 10:11 PM |
Filtration Question | Cyndie | General | 5 | April 2nd 04 02:08 PM |
Filtration question | Bruce Abrams | General | 1 | December 13th 03 02:40 AM |