Evolutionist can't answer the most important question of all

What's up jabberhole, received too few insults lately? Need to use yet
another alias to get what you deserve?

wrote:

Another thorny question that evolutionists have failed to answer
is: What was the origin of life?

Of course, evolution only deals with how _existing_ lifeforms change over
time, but fundie boy can't tell _that_ to his zombies, can he? After all,
they might realize that he babbles roasted bull****...

more than a hundred years ago, the French chemist Louis
Pasteur clearly demonstrated that life can come only from preexisting
life.

Too bad that Pasteur actually disproved BIOgenesis, which is more a form of
cretinism than a scientific theory. ABIOgenesis is a remarkably plausible
theory, though (as far as I know) not as well-supported as evolution.
But again, fundie boy can't tell that to his cultists. After all, the
strawman he burnt above is the only "weapon" (HA!) he has against
abiogenesis...

Between a
living cell and the most highly ordered non-biological system, such
as a crystal or a snowflake, there is a chasm as vast and absolute as
it is possible to conceive.”

Fortunately, there's much more intermediate steps between current cells and
non-living matter than fundie boy thinks. But yet again, if he told that to
his cult zombies, they'd realize that he has nothing but lies...

The idea that nonliving material could
come to life by some haphazard chance is so remote as to be
impossible.

Oh, and did I mention already that chemical reactions are NOT random?

The Bible’s explanation, that ‘life came from life’ in
that life was created by God, is convincingly in harmony with the
facts.

Who cares? A nice-sounding lie is still a lie. And the original poster is,
of course, the standard moronical babblical cretinist. 'nuff said.

--
Regards

Thore "Tocis" Schmechtig