Evolutionist can't answer the most important question of all

wrote:
Another thorny question that evolutionists have failed to answer
is:

Do you always have imaginary conversations on Usenet?

JohnN

"El Bleacho" writes:

Interesting that no new life forms have been created since the
appearance of Man. And why aren't new life forms appearing all the
time out of inorganic material today? We have plenty of inorganic
material left on this planet.

The fundamental reason that abiogenesis only happens once is
pretty simple: there exist plenty of life-forms on this planet that
regard the building blocks of life as a meal, ready-to-eat.

Elf

kathryn wrote:
Even under far different conditions, though, there is a huge gap
between nonliving matter and the simplest living thing. Michael
Denton, in his book Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, says: "Between a
living cell and the most highly ordered non-biological system, such
as a crystal or a snowflake, there is a chasm as vast and absolute as
it is possible to conceive." The idea that nonliving material could
come to life by some haphazard chance is so remote as to be
impossible. The Bible's explanation, that 'life came from life' in
that life was created by God, is convincingly in harmony with the
facts.


So where did god come from?

From the same place that Energy and Matter does :-)

The most painful thing to accept is that no matter how good you think your
question is, it's been asked a bazillion fricking times.

And more poetically put by Moloko:

'It was decided before you I why'

!!

On 30 Jun 2005 15:02:29 -0000, wrote:

Another thorny question that evolutionists have failed to answer
is: What was the origin of life? How did the first simple form of
life—from which we are all supposed to have descended—come into
existence?

As it doesn't claim to, it's difficult to see your point.


---

"This is how liberty dies: with thunderous applause"
- Padme Amidala, Episode III

"Another thorny question that evolutionists have failed to answer is:
What was the origin of life? "

Neo-Darwinism is not about the origin of life. What you're looking for
is the field of abiogenesis. But of course, being a Creationist idiot
(what a redundancy), you won't look this up at all.


Hellbound Alleee
.................................................. ...............
Listen to the Hellbound Alleee Show at http://www.hellboundalleee.com
.................................................. ...............

In article ,
wrote:
Another thorny question that evolutionists have failed to answer
is: What was the origin of life?

The planets moved before anybody could explain how or why they moved.
Unanswered questions are merely unanswered questions, not evidence
for some Twilight Zone hypothesis of yours.

--
David Canzi "Upon blind faith they place reliance.
What we need more of is science!" -- MC Hawking

wrote in message
...

Another thorny question that evolutionists have failed to answer
is: What was the origin of life?

A magical super-duper being zapped it into existence, then hid all evidence
of his existence so that 10 billion years later, ape descendants would
worship him BECAUSE there is no evidence! Just one questions.....what's
the origin of your god thingy? Who created him? How did he come into
existence? If you are claiming evolution can't exist because we don't know
the origin of life (which by the way has nothing what so ever to do with
evolution...but you're too ignorant to grasp that) I guess if you can't
explain the origin of your Gawd then it mustn't exist either!

wrote in message
oups.com...


Christopher A. Lee wrote:
On 30 Jun 2005 15:02:29 -0000, wrote:


Another thorny question that evolutionists have failed to answer
is: What was the origin of life? How did the first simple form of
life-from which we are all supposed to have descended-come into
existence? Centuries ago, this would not have appeared to be a
problem. Most people then thought that flies could develop from
decaying meat and that a pile of old rags could spontaneously produce
mice. But, more than a hundred years ago, the French chemist Louis
Pasteur clearly demonstrated that life can come only from preexisting
life.

Are you really this stupid, or just being dishonest?

1. There is no such thing as an "evolutionist".

There is no mafia neither ;-)


2. Evolution has nothing to say on the origins of life.

Without an Origin of life, evolution can not be discussed.

3. Abiogenesis research has discovered more than you realise.


And it still can't be done in a test tube.


What....is there a fourth grade outing on the Usenet today? You don't seem
to have the most fundamental understanding of either science or logic....so
you're pretty much making a fool of yourself!

Cry us a river...

Cracklin' wrote:
"Thore "Tocis" Schmechtig" wrote in message
...
What's up jabberhole, received too few insults lately? Need to use yet
another alias to get what you deserve?

wrote:
=========================================
He's illegally using the legitimate e-mail addresses of other people. The
Jehovah's Witnesses call this "theocratic warfare strategy."
--
CR.....
How did we get here?
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
=================================
"To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as
erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin."
[Cardinal Bellarmine 1615, during the trial of Galileo]
================================