![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
MOst folks regard a Damsel as a cheap fish which is very abundant at a
very cheap price ( Often for less than $3.00 with mewmber card at Petco) as a way to test your waters and see if everything is on par........That way if something is not quite right your not out a hea of money if they croak....I view it like this.I trust my test kits and my knoweledge..I would not feel any different placing a damsel in a new setup that was properly cycled and water parameters in check than I would a an Angel fish of $30.00 If the water is right and conditions are what they should be then things should be fine as long as they are introduced one or two at a time, depending on how large a system it is and your filtration. If I was going to have any damsels, I would add them last so they are the new guys on the block so they may not be so boisterous and already have established territories setup...... I do not believe in sacrificing any fish to test the waters......simple if its not right for a high dollar fish then no fish go in it. The only exceptions would be fish that eat mainly copepods etc such as dragonets, and in that case the tank would have to be pretty well establised and aged with a large population of stuff for the dragonets to eat. I see lots of dragonets getting sold at various places and when you talk to the ones buying them they say things like, yea, we just got our 55 gal setup cycled and have had 4 damsels in it for a month, or yea we have one up now for about a year......so now were going to add those pretty dragonets......which on rare occasions will eat prepared foods but most times they starve in most any tank that is not well established. Its a real shame, but evidently they are pretty abundant just like damsels as around this part they go for under $15 a fish....... -- \\\|/// ( @ @ ) -----------oOOo(_)oOOo--------------- oooO ---------( )----Oooo---------------- \ ( ( ) \_) ) / (_/ The original frugal ponder! Koi-ahoi mates.... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I still think that the number one stupid mistake of the
century is when a lady purchased some live rock from a store, and took it home and put it in the aquarium, only to find out that it had bugs on it, so she took it out and sprayed it with raid, and put it back in. Naturaly everything died. :-) Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Wayne Sallee wrote on 12/20/2005 8:09 PM: One thing, though, is that it's different for an experienced reefer to start out a tank with an expensive fish, than it is for a new fish keeper to start out with an expensive fish. New fish keepers make lots of mistakes. Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Roy wrote on 12/20/2005 6:30 PM: MOst folks regard a Damsel as a cheap fish which is very abundant at a very cheap price ( Often for less than $3.00 with mewmber card at Petco) as a way to test your waters and see if everything is on par........That way if something is not quite right your not out a hea of money if they croak....I view it like this.I trust my test kits and my knoweledge..I would not feel any different placing a damsel in a new setup that was properly cycled and water parameters in check than I would a an Angel fish of $30.00 If the water is right and conditions are what they should be then things should be fine as long as they are introduced one or two at a time, depending on how large a system it is and your filtration. If I was going to have any damsels, I would add them last so they are the new guys on the block so they may not be so boisterous and already have established territories setup...... I do not believe in sacrificing any fish to test the waters......simple if its not right for a high dollar fish then no fish go in it. The only exceptions would be fish that eat mainly copepods etc such as dragonets, and in that case the tank would have to be pretty well establised and aged with a large population of stuff for the dragonets to eat. I see lots of dragonets getting sold at various places and when you talk to the ones buying them they say things like, yea, we just got our 55 gal setup cycled and have had 4 damsels in it for a month, or yea we have one up now for about a year......so now were going to add those pretty dragonets......which on rare occasions will eat prepared foods but most times they starve in most any tank that is not well established. Its a real shame, but evidently they are pretty abundant just like damsels as around this part they go for under $15 a fish....... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne Sallee wrote:
I still think that the number one stupid mistake of the century is when a lady purchased some live rock from a store, and took it home and put it in the aquarium, only to find out that it had bugs on it, so she took it out and sprayed it with raid, and put it back in. Naturaly everything died. :-) I've worked in retail for years and that is pretty much the funniest thing that I've heard yet! mark h |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nitrogen cycle is a natural way to handle leftover food and animal waste generated (such as fish). This is caused by bacteria and become established in the tank when the food supply. No fish means no bacteria are usually always be established.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nitrogen cycle is a natural way to handle leftover food and animal waste generated (such as fish). This is caused by bacteria and become established in the tank when the food supply. No fish means no bacteria are usually always be established.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hurt Betta and Goldfish , Help !!! | Cassie | General | 37 | November 22nd 05 07:53 PM |
PHYSICAL symptoms of overstocking | Gfishery | General | 26 | April 15th 05 09:38 PM |
My first 1.5 years in fish keeping & the costs when you do everything wrong [LONG] | George Thompson | Goldfish | 4 | January 5th 04 06:14 PM |
Comedey of Errors - Wait or Medicate | NSP | General | 20 | November 14th 03 04:32 AM |
LFS owners, please read..... | ~Vicki ~ | Cichlids | 33 | August 24th 03 05:21 PM |