![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You have to stop smoking that thing Wayne, it is destroying the few neurons
left in your gray matter. iy "Wayne Sallee" wrote in message ... Inabón Yunes wrote on 7/23/2006 12:50 AM: In the case of fish, well, they are a couple of steps down from birds in the evolutionary scale. Evolution is a great for people that don't want to acknowledge the reality of the Creator. My computer evolved from a toaster oven. I tried to make some toast the other day, but even though the slots are of different sizes, I could not get a slice of bread in there. Obviously, an inferior evolutionary process. I'm sure it will become extinct soon. Get a chain, and cut every other link. Throw out all of the cut links. Take all of the intact links and arrange them so that they look pretty. You will then have a good working model of the theory of evolution. Actually, evolution is easy to prove. Simply gather some old bones from a variety of animals (your choice), and some human bones, and put them together so that they look half human, and then give it a name like Suzie. Scientist have recently discovered a new class of creatures down deep in the sea. They have classified them in the zoowacko group. They have 2 heads and 3 eyes on each head :-) Zigg and Zagg, Martians from Venus (they were born on Mars, but now live on Venus), did a study of the evolutionary order on earth. They decided to first doccument the order of evolvement of machines, since it was what most interested them. It was quite interesting reading, and learning how the different machines evolved from each other, like cars, trucks, microwaves, television sets, laptops, PDA's, watches, cranes, excetera. If you do a search on the internet you might be able to find their report :-) They still have a few missing links to figure out. After they get that study completely finished, they are going to do their next study on animals and it's evolvement on the great planet Earth. After both of those studies are completed and proven, they are to decide "which came first, the animals, or the machines?" Zigg and Zagg have pritty-much decided that the machines came first since they are more basic in construction than the animals, but that has yet to be proven. Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Quick question Wayne!
Who said that God existed? Can you proof it? I can but I didn't need a bible for it... BTW, this is an aquarists forum, take your ignorant and foolish theories to another group full of people that believe in that. iy "Wayne Sallee" wrote in message ... Pszemol wrote on 7/24/2006 11:25 AM: Scientist have recently discovered a new class of creatures down deep in the sea. They have classified them in the zoowacko group. They have 2 heads and 3 eyes on each head :-) Oh, really ? I would like to read about them... Throw some details, please. Notice the "zowacko" name :-) Obviously there are no creatures with 2 heads and 3 eyes on each head. :-) There are deformities some times, but they are not normal. One thing that I find interesting, is that people that believe in evolution think that there is less similarities between people and animals than people that believe in creation. Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
He knows better but he put his learnings in a secluted place in his
bathroom. He has seen many time evolution in progress as you watch a larvae turning into a crab. Better yet, a one cell organism becoming a human everytime a woman gets pregnant. iy "Pszemol" wrote in message ... "Wayne Sallee" wrote in message ... LOL what's that supposed to mean??? I'm one of a kind :-) hehehe I do not think your argument with toaster oven was an originally yours... But anyway - is there any proof for evolution you would be willing to accet as "convincing" you the theory works ? Or you just totaly reject the theory on the basis of religion and your faith/believe in God ?? In the second case no proof, even the "in your face" one would change your mind and the further discussion is simply mute. Please let me know - we could then move on to more interesting stuff ;-) |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne Sallee" wrote in message ...
Instinct: a largely inheritable and unalterable tendency of an organism to make a complex and specific response to environmental stimuli without involving reason. So someone decided to redefine the word? hehehe No, no redefine... I should say there are two kinds of reflexes: instincts (inheritable) and conditioned reflexes - these are the ones you "learn" during the life... Both kinds of reflexes have nothing to do with intelligence. I find it interesting that you are arguing in this direction after your earlier argument about the anemone fish and it's anemone. My argument before had nothing to do with evolution... Here I am reacting to your statements about creationism. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne Sallee wrote in
: atomweaver wrote on 7/24/2006 3:25 PM: Balance snipped, since it can be read here; http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...msg/86afab43d6 3180d 0?dmode=source How disappointingly unoriginal, Wayne... LOL what's that supposed to mean??? I'm one of a kind :-) hehehe Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Errmm. It means I'm really disappointed in how unoriginal your post was. I'll be the first to recognize and value your opinion on matters related to fishkeeping. One would think that you might learn from seeing the results of misguided information wrt reefkeeping, that posting from ignorance is never a Good Thing(tm). I guess not... you know almost nothing about ToE, but still post about it, without regard to the impact of your ignorance. I'm also disappointed in a lot of aspects of what you're posting about. Creationism is an aspect of overzealous conservatism. Its a petty hi-jacking of Christianity by small-minded folk, who undermine Christian faith by trivializing the Bible and its teachings with an overly-literal interpretation, in most instances for political, rather than spiritual, ends. What a lame duck to align yourself with, Wayne... I can't think of another single idea which so stupidly undermine both valid scientific education _and_ the very religion which it claims to be a proponent of. I'm one of a kind :-) hehehe Sadly, on this matter, you're all too common. Regards, R. David Zopf Atom Weaver |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne Sallee" wrote in message ...
Pszemol wrote on 7/24/2006 6:08 PM: I do not think your argument with toaster oven was an originally yours... You are correct on that :-) Any response to my question ? Or you prefer to leave it unanswered ? |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pszemol wrote on 7/24/2006 5:48 PM:
Fish reaction to food is the first kind: they do not have to learn to eat. Fish reacting to the fridge opening or seeing a person next to the tank is the second kind - the same as the one Pavlov dogs developed an salivation reflex for the sound of the bell. Do more reading here http://www.es.flinders.edu.au/~matto...lecture30.html People do that, hence the phrase "mouth watering". Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Inabón Yunes wrote on 7/23/2006 12:50 AM:
I used to raise fighting chicken. They are territorial and will defend its domain to the death, literally. You see, they have no choice, they will respond to a stimuli in the same way over and over and over again. So, if they get a response "starter" the reaction will be the same. People will do that :-) And dogs have been raised for that, but dogs can't think for themselves can they :-) hehehe Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
atomweaver wrote on 7/25/2006 8:50 AM:
I'm also disappointed in a lot of aspects of what you're posting about. Creationism is an aspect of overzealous conservatism. Its a petty hi-jacking of Christianity by small-minded folk, who undermine Christian faith by trivializing the Bible and its teachings with an overly-literal interpretation, in most instances for political, rather than spiritual, ends. What a lame duck to align yourself with, Wayne... I can't think of another single idea which so stupidly undermine both valid scientific education _and_ the very religion which it claims to be a proponent of. LOL you crack me up. Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New to Goldfish...having troubles. | Adam Lion | Goldfish | 9 | April 26th 05 09:44 AM |
San Diego Tropical Fish Society, July 11th | SanDiegoFishes | General | 0 | July 7th 04 02:59 AM |
NYT Mag article about goldfish vets | Gunther | Goldfish | 1 | May 3rd 04 12:03 PM |
Watering the aquarium plants. | Cardman | Plants | 29 | April 11th 04 04:02 AM |
Alkalinity problems? | D&M | General | 5 | July 15th 03 12:48 AM |