Forum: Reefs
November 4th 06, 06:37 PM Posted to rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
|
Replies: 1
Views: 1,433
|
Forum: Reefs
September 22nd 06, 11:12 PM Posted to rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
|
Replies: 33
Views: 8,057
Cycle Question
Doing a water change percentage sufficient to reduce the
levels of ammonia and nitrite to levels that won't kill off the remaining
life, will still leave plenty of food for the bacteria. Keep...
|
Forum: Reefs
September 22nd 06, 10:59 PM Posted to rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
|
Replies: 33
Views: 8,057
Cycle Question
Correction:
(B) should have read "and come back down via nitrosomonas" not nitrobacter.
Oops.
(B) Performing NO water change, will allow the NH3 concentration to go up
(nitrobacter proliferation...
|
Forum: Reefs
September 22nd 06, 10:55 PM Posted to rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
|
Replies: 33
Views: 8,057
Cycle Question
How do they know that the bacteriostatic effect they are describing is
a result of high NH3 concentration? Is this discussed in the
publication or are they making assumptions?
Does...
|
Forum: Reefs
September 22nd 06, 04:52 AM Posted to rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
|
Replies: 33
Views: 8,057
Cycle Question
Btw... according to recently published research done by Tetra the long
held
believe that nitrosomonas and nitrobacter are the main bacteria
responcible
for the nitrogen cycle in aquaria...
|
Forum: Reefs
September 22nd 06, 04:12 AM Posted to rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
|
Replies: 33
Views: 8,057
Cycle Question
I am not sure what you mean by "make it harder", but if you are
implying that high NH3 levels kill the nitrobacter than what is the
ED50 for this? Furthermore, is the ED50 less than the...
|
Forum: Reefs
September 21st 06, 11:45 PM Posted to rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
|
Replies: 33
Views: 8,057
Cycle Question
"what is the ED50 for this?"
That's LD50, not ED50. Typo sorry!
|
Forum: Reefs
September 19th 06, 12:10 AM Posted to rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
|
Replies: 11
Views: 4,689
Opinion on which sump to get????
George. I will put it easier terms for you so you understand. The aerobic
bacteria EAT the oxygen.
For aerobic bacteria oxygen is GOOD :)
For anaerobic bacteria oxygen is BAD :(
|
Forum: Reefs
September 17th 06, 03:07 PM Posted to rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
|
Replies: 60
Views: 13,526
Denitrators
Though I would not call it food, any more than I would call oxygen food
for us, but the oxygen has to be taken in since it's not after the
nitrogen except for growth.
One more thing since...
|
Forum: Reefs
September 17th 06, 02:24 PM Posted to rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
|
Replies: 60
Views: 13,526
Denitrators
Though I would not call it food, any more than I would
call oxygen food for us, but the oxygen has to be taken in since it's not
after the nitrogen except for growth.
What do you mean by...
|
Forum: Reefs
September 17th 06, 02:05 AM Posted to rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
|
Replies: 60
Views: 13,526
Denitrators
If Patterson believes that oxygen is removed by the enzyme and only N2 is
produced. What happens to the oxygen? Where do you/he think it goes?
Do you think it stays in the enzyme?
...
|
Forum: Reefs
September 17th 06, 01:32 AM Posted to rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
|
Replies: 60
Views: 13,526
Denitrators
Very good! When did I write water molecules were broken up?
You stated that hydrogen combines with oxygen from the NO3 to produce H2O.
When asked where the hydrogen comes from, you stated...
|
Forum: Reefs
September 17th 06, 01:24 AM Posted to rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
|
Replies: 60
Views: 13,526
Denitrators
What do you think happens to the oxygen that is "removed" by the
bacteria?
That's its food.
This is a good one. You think oxygen is food for the ANAEROBIC bacteria.
Hmmm...
|
Forum: Reefs
September 17th 06, 01:21 AM Posted to rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
|
Replies: 60
Views: 13,526
Denitrators
I will write this again for the umpteen time. This process is called
DENITRIFICATION. It is an enzymatic process that converts NO3- into H2O
and N2 (O2 is NOT produced).
And, once...
|
Forum: Reefs
September 17th 06, 01:19 AM Posted to rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
|
Replies: 60
Views: 13,526
Denitrators
If Patterson believes that oxygen is removed by the enzyme and only N2 is
produced. What happens to the oxygen? Where do you/he think it goes?
Do you think it stays in the enzyme?
...
|
Forum: Reefs
September 16th 06, 10:55 PM Posted to rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
|
Replies: 60
Views: 13,526
Denitrators
Ok, so your point is that he is saying no to your no :-)
And you are saying no to his no :-)
No ;)
Not exactly.
|
Forum: Reefs
September 16th 06, 10:28 PM Posted to rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
|
Replies: 60
Views: 13,526
Denitrators
Wayne. Follow closely. I will type slowly for you.
I (STOUTMAN) WROTE:
NO3 is not split into N2 and O2 it is broken down enzymatically into N2
and H2O.
PATTERSON WROTE THIS IN RESPONSE TO...
|
Forum: Reefs
September 16th 06, 10:18 PM Posted to rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
|
Replies: 60
Views: 13,526
Denitrators
Wayne what statements of MINE have I turned around?
Give one.
|
Forum: Reefs
September 16th 06, 10:11 PM Posted to rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
|
Replies: 60
Views: 13,526
Denitrators
In order for the NO3 to give us N2 and H2O, wouldn't you need free H+
ions roaming around?
No. This process (denitrification) happens at an enzymatic/cellular
(anaerobic bacteria) level. The...
|
Forum: Reefs
September 16th 06, 09:57 PM Posted to rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
|
Replies: 60
Views: 13,526
Denitrators
In the post that you quoted, he did not say that oxygen
was produced, yet you said that he was wrong, and now you are trying to
prove yourself right by adding stuff that was not in the post...
|
Forum: Reefs
September 16th 06, 09:53 PM Posted to rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
|
Replies: 60
Views: 13,526
Denitrators
No, it's not. The oxygen is removed by bacteria, releasing the nitrogen.
What do you think happens to the oxygen that is "removed" by the bacteria?
George Patterson
Coffee is only a way...
|
Forum: Reefs
September 16th 06, 09:43 PM Posted to rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
|
Replies: 60
Views: 13,526
Denitrators
NO3 is not split into N2 and O2 it is broken down enzymatically into N2
and H2O.
No, it's not. The oxygen is removed by bacteria, releasing the nitrogen.
The oxygens are removed from...
|
Forum: Reefs
September 16th 06, 09:31 PM Posted to rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
|
Replies: 60
Views: 13,526
Denitrators
In the post that you quoted, he did not say that oxygen
was produced
Neither did I. When did I write O2 was produced? Read this again: NO3
goes to N2 and H2O. No O2 is produced in this...
|
Forum: Reefs
September 16th 06, 09:21 PM Posted to rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
|
Replies: 60
Views: 13,526
Denitrators
No, it doesn't. You are basically arguing that you start out with NO3 and
H2O
and it goes
No I am not arguing that.
2NO3 & 2H2O ---- 2NO2 & 2H2 ---- 2N01 & 2H2 ---- N2 & 2H2O.
|
Forum: Reefs
September 16th 06, 05:22 PM Posted to rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
|
Replies: 60
Views: 13,526
Denitrators
I meant to write oxygen's that are removed from NO3- end up as H2O.
It actually goes NO3---NO2----N2 + H2O
|